Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 31;13:14285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40660-1

Table 3.

Linear mixed-effect model for the self-rated listening effort (upper part) and motivation (lower part).

Predictor Estimate Std. error t-value p-value
Self-rated listening effort
 (Intercept) 41.49 2.69 15.44 < 0.001 ***
 Listening condition [easy] 1.84 1.52 1.21 0.23
 Reading comprehension [high] 0.64 2.84 − 0.23 0.82
 Inhibition [high] 7.18 2.72 2.64 0.01 **
 Noise sensitivity [high] − 2.79 2.78 − 1.00 0.32
 Listening condition: reading comprehension − 0.75 1.60 − 0.47 0.64
 Listening condition: inhibition − 2.42 1.54 − 1.58 0.12
 Listening condition: noise sensitivity − 3.46 1.57 − 2.21 0.03 **
 Marginal R2/Conditional R2: 0.078/0.554
 AIC: 2001.6
Self-rated motivation
 (Intercept) 77.93 1.93 40.46 < 0.001 ***
 Listening condition [easy] − 1.08 1.09 − 0.99 0.33
 Reading comprehension [high] − 1.13 2.03 − 0.55 0.58
 Noise sensitivity [high] − 2.41 1.99 − 1.21 0.23
 Inhibition [high] 0.81 1.95 0.42 0.68
 Listening condition: reading comprehension 2.71 1.15 2.34 0.021 *
 Listening condition: noise sensitivity − 0.15 1.13 − 0.13 0.90
 Listening condition: inhibition − 0.40 1.11 − 0.36 0.72
 Marginal R2/Conditional R2: 0.026 / 0.525
 AIC: 1864.2

Reference levels: listening condition Hard, reading comprehension Low, inhibition Low, noise sensitivity Low.

Significance codes for the p-values: ***< 0.001, **< 0.01, *< 0.05.