Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 25;9(9):e19200. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19200

Table 12.

Results of propensity score matching and Coarsened Exact Matching tests.

Variables (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
SC SC SC SC
Origin 0.051*** 0.056*** 0.049*** 0.039***
(3.24) (3.43) (3.01) (2.65)
Size −0.028*** −0.026*** −0.027*** −0.011
(-2.96) (-3.03) (-3.21) (-1.54)
Roa −3.646*** −3.760*** −3.904*** −3.171***
(-4.99) (-5.66) (-6.08) (-4.65)
lev 0.395*** 0.310*** 0.309*** 0.237***
(6.48) (5.68) (5.83) (5.71)
Instihold 0.011 0.011* 0.011**
(1.24) (1.73) (1.98)
Soe −0.046** −0.020 −0.013 −0.016
(-2.32) (-1.10) (-0.75) (-1.03)
Top1 −0.124* −0.121* −0.148**
(-1.69) (-1.88) (-2.33)
Top25 0.013 0.009 0.005
(0.62) (0.51) (0.27)
Boardsize 0.046 0.024 0.019 0.073
(0.90) (0.54) (0.44) (1.47)
Independ 0.541*** 0.425*** 0.426*** 0.476**
(3.30) (2.91) (2.94) (2.48)
Constant 0.830*** 0.902*** 0.949*** 0.343
(3.86) (4.65) (4.93) (1.57)
Industry FE YES YES YES YES
Year FE YES YES YES YES
N 2932 3959 4094 2749
Adj_R2 0.172 0.129 0.138 0.119

Notes: ***, **, and * indicate significant at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively. Industry and Year fixed effects are included.Standard errors were cluster-adjusted by firm-level.