Table 5.
Performance comparison (%) with previous methods on RAF-DB and FERPLUS.
| Methods | RAF-DB | FERPLUS |
|---|---|---|
| gACNN (Li et al., 2019) | 85.07 | - |
| RAN (Wang K. et al., 2019) | 86.90 | 88.55 |
| SCN (Wang et al., 2020) | 87.03 | 88.01 |
| DACL (Farzaneh and Qi, 2021) | 87.78 | - |
| KTN (Li et al., 2021) | 88.07 | - |
| MA-Net (Zhao et al., 2021) | 88.40 | - |
| RUL (Zhang et al., 2021) | - | 88.75 |
| DMUE (She et al., 2021) | - | 88.64 |
| SeNet50 (Albanie et al., 2018) | - | 88.80 |
| FFRA-Net(Ours) | 88.66 | 88.97 |
The bold values are outcomes from model runs described in this paper.