Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 17;17:1250706. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2023.1250706

Table 5.

Performance comparison (%) with previous methods on RAF-DB and FERPLUS.

Methods RAF-DB FERPLUS
gACNN (Li et al., 2019) 85.07 -
RAN (Wang K. et al., 2019) 86.90 88.55
SCN (Wang et al., 2020) 87.03 88.01
DACL (Farzaneh and Qi, 2021) 87.78 -
KTN (Li et al., 2021) 88.07 -
MA-Net (Zhao et al., 2021) 88.40 -
RUL (Zhang et al., 2021) - 88.75
DMUE (She et al., 2021) - 88.64
SeNet50 (Albanie et al., 2018) - 88.80
FFRA-Net(Ours) 88.66 88.97

The bold values are outcomes from model runs described in this paper.