Table 2.
Questionnaire investigating opinions on the proposed tools, and responses of data collectors (N = 14).
| Web-based data collection software | Responses, median score out of 10 (IQR) |
|---|---|
| User experience in completing the online data collection form | 7 (5–9) |
| Appropriateness of the user manual | 8 (5–9) |
| Training for data collectors | Responses, n (%) |
| Were the chosen topics appropriate? | |
| Not at all | 0 |
| Insufficiently | 0 |
| Sufficiently | 9 (64.3) |
| Completely | 5 (35.7) |
| Was the course easy to understand? | |
| Not at all | 0 |
| Insufficiently | 0 |
| Sufficiently | 9 (64.3) |
| Completely | 5 (35.7) |
| Study protocol | Responses, n (%) |
| Were the definitions clear? | |
| Not at all | 0 |
| Insufficiently | 0 |
| Sufficiently | 6 (42.9) |
| Completely | 8 (57.1) |
| Were the study objectives and design clearly described? | |
| Not at all | 0 |
| Insufficiently | 0 |
| Sufficiently | 8 (57.1) |
| Completely | 6 (42.9) |
| Were data collection forms sufficiently detailed? | |
| Not at all | 0 |
| Insufficiently | 1 (7.1) |
| Sufficiently | 7 (50) |
| Completely | 6 (42.9) |