Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 22;85(9):4531–4538. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001094

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the research population

References Country Design Follow-up (weeks) Age n Group Types of fillers (trade name) Mean vol. injection, ml (mean±SD) Injection materials Outcomes
Yang et al.5 2019a Korea RCT 48 20–65 36 Intervention Hyaluronic acid (Chaeum Shape) 19.14±1.4 20 mg/ml HA cross-linked Penile girth, satisfaction rate appearance, sexual satisfaction level, side effects
34 Control Polylactic acid (PowerFill) 20.59±1.28 10 g/3 ml microparticles PLA
Yang et al.22 2019b Korea RCT 24 19–65 37 Intervention Hyaluronic acid (Neuramis Deep) 20.8±1.5 20 mg/ml HA cross-linked Penile girth, satisfaction rate appearance, sexual satisfaction level, side effects
35 Control Polylactic acid (PowerFill) 21.8±1.7 10 g/3 ml microparticles PLA
Yang et al.6 2020 Korea RCT 72 20–66 33 Intervention Hyaluronic acid (Hyafilia Impact) 16.4±2.7 20 mg HA cross-linked+3 mg lidocaine/ml Penile girth, satisfaction rate appearance, sexual satisfaction level, side effects
34 Control Polylactic acid (PowerFill) 17.7±2.3 10 g/3 ml microparticles PLA
Ahn et al.17 Korea RCT 24 20–65 32 Intervention Hyaluronic acid (Doublofill) 15–22 23 mg HA cross-linked+3 mg lidocaine/2 ml Penile girth, sexual satisfaction rate, side effects
32 Control Polylactic acid (PowerFill) 15–22 10 g/3 ml microparticles PLA

PLA, polylactic acid.