Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2023 Aug 22:2023.08.21.23294382. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.08.21.23294382

Table 2B:

Summary of Granger causality analysis

Inflow Outflow
Onset -> Ip_AN Onset -> Ip_CM Ip_AN -> Onset Ip_CM -> Onset

Delta Raw GCA 0.28 0.23 0.31 0.27
%Change 54.49% 46.73% 78.25% 64.59%
Duration (s) 40 92 80 40
Latency (s) 7 7 7 7

Theta Raw GCA 0.25 0.22 0.26 0.25
%Change 49.81% 42.18% 63.01% 55.82%
Duration (s) 108 116 40 24
Latency (s) 3 −5 3 15

Alpha Raw GCA 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.22
%Change 35.50% 42.02% 47.85% 47.76%
Duration (s) 96 108 4 4
Latency (s) 7 3 7 31

Beta Raw GCA 0.23 0.21 0.19 0.19
%Change 45.49% 41.28% 30.16% 31.80%
Duration (s) 20 4 NA 48
Latency (s) 7 15 NA 51

Gamma Raw GCA 0.26 0.21 0.18 0.17
%Change 58.13% 44.48% 12.32% 10.81%
Duration (s) 55 40 8 92
Latency (s) 40 23 87 51

NA: Not applicable (the value could not be determined because the calculation did not reach statistical significance)

GCA: Granger causality analysis; Ip: ipsilateral; Co: contralateral; AN: anterior nucleus; CM: centromedian nucleus