Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 1;13:290. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02578-0

Table 2.

ITT analysis results for number of intrusive memories (treatment effects for between-arm comparison of primary outcome, and within delayed arm comparison of secondary outcome).

Number of Intrusive Memories (IMs) Delayed arm (n = 39) Immediate arm (n = 36) ITT Treatment Effect Estimate
IRR 95% CI
Primary Outcome (Week 4) – Between Arm Comparison
Median, IQR 10.00 (6.0, 17.0) 1.00 (0.0, 3.0) 0.31*** 0.20, 0.48
Mean, SD 12.46 9.28 4.03 10.68
Secondary Outcome (Week 8, after crossovera) - Within Delayed Arm Comparison
Median, IQR 1.00 (0.0, 2.50) 0.31*** 0.21, 0.45
Mean, SD 3.78 7.23
Baseline/Run-In Week
Median, IQR 14.00 (8.0, 19.0) 14.50 (10.0, 21.50)
Mean, SD 17.08 15.84 18.50 13.61

Treatment effects presented for between-arm comparison of number of intrusive memories at week 4 (primary outcome), and within delayed arm comparison of number of intrusive memories at week 8 (after crossover) from week 4. Median (IQR) and Mean (s.d.) of number of intrusive memories at baseline, week 4, and week 8 are also presented.

ITT intention to treat, IRR incidence rate ratio, CI confidence interval, IQR interquartile range, SD standard deviation.

***p < 0.001;

aITT treatment effect estimate within the delayed arm after crossover (weeks 4–8).