Table 3.
Comparison of LOR features by applicant gender while controlling for recommender gender.
| Category | Applicant | %Diff | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | |||
| All recommenders | ||||
| Applications | 1433 | 2435 | – | – |
| Length (chars) | 2293 | 2198 | 4% | 0.0038 |
| Positivity | 1.4417 | 1.2854 | 11% | |
| Specificity | 1.6490 | 1.5347 | 7% | 0.0001 |
| e-Anger | 0.0603 | 0.0616 | % | 0.0037 |
| t-Polite | 0.3084 | 0.3256 | % | |
| t-Sad | 0.1486 | 0.1424 | 4% | 0.0058 |
| Female recommenders | ||||
| Applications | 447 | 542 | – | – |
| Length (chars) | 2402 | 2241 | 7% | 0.0155 |
| Positivity | 1.5257 | 1.2970 | 16% | |
| Specificity | 1.7494 | 1.5590 | 12% | 0.0004 |
| e-Anger | 0.0591 | 0.0615 | % | 0.0054 |
| t-Polite | 0.3061 | 0.3242 | % | 0.0242 |
| t-Sad | 0.1420 | 0.1317 | 8% | 0.0068 |
| Male Recommenders | ||||
| Applications | 825 | 1561 | – | – |
| Positivity | 1.4024 | 1.2735 | 10% | 0.0002 |
| Specificity | 1.6097 | 1.5234 | 6% | 0.0242 |
| t-Polite | 0.3068 | 0.3243 | % | 0.0013 |