Table 1.
Molecular entity | Molecular function | Gene | Predicted activitya | Correct/totalb | Prediction p-valuec | Distanced | Evidencee |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRF1 | Transcription factor | IRF1 | + |
60/62* 17/17** |
4.24E-16f 7.63E-06g |
1 | Yes59,60 |
STAT1 | Transcription factor | STAT1 | + |
64/70* 15/16** |
1.22E-13f 2.59E-04g |
1 | Yes118–122 |
RelA (p65 NF-kB subunit) | Transcription factor | RELA | + |
59/78* 14/15** |
3.21E-06f 4.88E-04g |
1 | Yes123–132 |
STAT2 | Transcription factor | STAT2 | + |
23/24* 8/8** |
1.49E-06f 3.91E-03g |
1 | Yes117,133–137 |
IRF3 | Transcription factor | IRF3 | + |
19/22* 9/9** |
4.28E-04f 1.95E-03g |
1 | Yes138–148 |
aPredicted activity of the key hub by causal reasoning is denoted by – if the hub is inhibited, and denoted by + if the hub is activated.
bCorrect/total network predictions show the number of genes in the dataset predicted correctly over the total number of genes in the causal reasoning network.
cCalculation distance from the upstream regulatory key hubs and downstream genes.
For example, distances of 2 and 3 identify key hubs that are distant key hubs, while a distance of 1 identify closest one-step away transcriptional factors.
dp-value of the predicted protein activity calculated using the polynomial test.
eEvidence for an existing experimental link between the transcription factor and menstrual irregularity.
fp-value of the predicted protein activity calculated using the polynomial test for GS1.
gp-value of the predicted protein activity calculated using the polynomial test for GS2.
*For GS1.
**For GS2.