Table 1.
Level of evidence | Reference | Key characteristics | Key findings |
---|---|---|---|
GLP-1RAs | |||
Cohort studies | Issar et al 2021 [93] | N=90. Exenatide vs DPP-4i vs SGLT2i vs healthy control participants for cross-sectional study. Ten patients taking exenatide followed for a further 3 months in a prospective study and compared with 32 control participants. | Improvements in nerve physiological measures with exenatide use compared with no exenatide use, including improved nerve function, S2 accommodation, superexcitabillity and subexcitabilty. These changes were independent of HbA1c reduction. |
Deng et al 2022 [76] | N=8252. Compared insulin glargine, liraglutide, glimepiride and sitagliptin. Propensity scores used to account for differences in baseline characteristic. These were created from several baseline characteristics (including HbA1c, ethnicity and comorbidity). | No significant difference in neuropathy incidence with liraglutide use compared with other medications. | |
RCTs | Ponirakis et al 2020 [94] | N=38. Three months of pioglitazone and exenatide vs glargine with aspart insulin. | Vibration perception worsened after 3 months’ usage of pioglitazone and exenatide with no change in neuropathic pain. |
Jaiswal et al 2015 [95] | N=46. Exenatide vs insulin glargine. | No significant difference in incident neuropathy or electrophysiology markers. | |
Brock et al 2019 [96] | N=36 (type 1 diabetes) with confirmed polyneuropathy. Randomised to liraglutide or placebo. | No effect of liraglutide on measures of nerve function. | |
GRADE Study Research Group et al 2022 [77] | N=5047. Compared insulin glargine, liraglutide, glimepiride and sitagliptin. | No difference in incidence of diabetic polyneuropathy between any of the four medications over a median follow-up of 5 years. | |
Simulated long-term follow-up of RCT | Sullivan et al 2009 [97] |
N=746 + three n=5000 hypothetical cohorts. Liraglutide vs glimepiride. |
Predicted neuropathy incidence was lower in the liraglutide group. |
DPP-4is | |||
Cross-sectional studies | Issar et al 2021 [93] | N=90. Exenatide vs DPP-4i vs SGLT2i vs healthy control participants. | Physiological markers of nerve function were similar in DPP-4i and SGLT2i groups with more favourable findings in the exenatide group. |
Cohort studies | Kolaczynski et al 2016 [71] | N=16,321. Propensity score matching to compare vildagliptin use to sulfonylureas. Propensity scores were derived from the probability of treatment assignment from the following baseline factors: age, sex, line of therapy, HbA1c score, duration of disease (<5 years vs ≥5 years), duration of treatment, previous hypoglycaemic events, co-prescribed medications and number of comorbidities. | Lower neuropathy incidence with vildagliptin OR 0.71 (95% CI 0.60, 0.85). |
Deng et al 2022 [76] | N=8252. Compared insulin glargine, liraglutide, glimepiride and sitagliptin. Propensity scores used to account for differences in baseline characteristics. These were created from several baseline characteristics (including HbA1c, ethnicity and comorbidity). | Sitagliptin appeared to be associated with lower neuropathy incidence compared with glimepiride HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.76, 0.99), although this was not statistically significant after the p value was adjusted for multiple testing (p=0.09). | |
RCTs | da Silva et al 2015 [98] (abstract only) | N=30. Sitagliptin vs NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes of long duration. | No difference in electrophysiological markers of neuropathy at 1 year. |
TECOS trial, original publication: Green et al 2015 [73] | N= 14,671. Sitagliptin vs placebo. | Incidence of diabetic neuropathy 4.1% in Sitagliptin group, 3.8% in placebo. | |
TECOS trial, CKD participants only: Engel et al 2017 [99] |
N=3324. Sitagliptin vs placebo. Subgroup analysis of patients with CKD. | No significant difference in neuropathy incidence was observed, risk difference for sitagliptin vs placebo using M-N method = 0.21 (95% CI −1.09, 1.53). | |
GRADE Study Research Group et al 2022 [77] | N=5047. Compared insulin glargine, liraglutide, glimepiride and sitagliptin. | No difference in incidence of diabetic polyneuropathy between any of the four medications over a median follow-up of 5 years. | |
Gabriel et al 2023 [79] | N=658. Linagliptin vs placebo vs metformin vs linagliptin + metformin. | Linagliptin associated with 19.5% (95% CI 10.1, 29.0) reduction in small fibre peripheral neuropathy compared with placebo. |
CKD, chronic kidney disease; SGLT2i, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor