Table 1.
Project selection criteria.
| Click one number per row below using the following scale |
1: Necessary |
2: Absolutely Necessary |
3: Very Necessary |
4: Important |
5: Absolutely Important |
6: Very Important |
7: Absolutely Important |
8: Extremely Important |
9: Extremely Very Important. SCORES |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Criteria | Sub Criteria | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| Social Effect [11] | Job creation [43] | |||||||||
| Social amenities [38] | ||||||||||
| Quality of life/Benefits for human life [32,44] | ||||||||||
| Economic developments to communities [45,46] | ||||||||||
| Social Integration [Authors] | Eliminate unrest in the areas [Authors] | |||||||||
| Political impact/alignment/context [27] | ||||||||||
| Political risk that depends on the policy [43] | ||||||||||
| Community acceptance [47] | ||||||||||
| Operating Factor [Authors] | Location of project [Authors] | |||||||||
| Abandonment of project [Authors] | ||||||||||
| Completion time [48] | ||||||||||
| Project risk [44] | ||||||||||
| Regulatory Agency [27] | Technical Support of Project Department [Authors] | |||||||||
| Local contractor's competency | ||||||||||
| Quality of job [Authors] | ||||||||||
| Work experience of PM [27] | ||||||||||
| Facilities of local contractor [Authors] | ||||||||||
| Project Alternatives | School | |||||||||
| Housing | ||||||||||
| Water Jetty and Walkways | ||||||||||