Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 1;23:468. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02583-x

Table 2.

Comparison of single high-risk HPV infection type between the two groups (n, %)

HR-HPV infection type LSIL-CIN 1 group(n = 125) HSIL-CIN 2, CIN 3 group(n = 115) X2 P
HR-HPV16 38(25.3) 71(45.5) 13.579 0.000
 h-HPV18 13(8.7) 9(5.8) 0.962 0.327
 h-HPV31 4(2.7) 5(3.2) 0.078 0.780
 h-HPV33 5(3.3) 20(12.8) 9.174 0.002
 h-HPV35 6(4.0) 4(2.6) 0.284 0.594
 h-HPV39 4(2.7) 3(1.9) 0.189 0.664
 h-HPV45 2(1.3) 0(0.0) 0.544 0.461
 h-HPV51 7(4.7) 7(4.5) 0.006 0.940
 h-HPV52 31(20.7) 17(10.9) 5.518 0.019
 h-HPV56 7(4.7) 4(2.6) 0.708 0.400
 h-HPV58 21(14.0) 10(6.4) 4.838 0.028
 h-HPV59 4(2.7) 2(1.3) 0.157 0.692
 h-HPV66 1(0.6) 0(0.0) 0.000 0.989
 h-HPV68 7(4.7) 4(2.6) 0.523 0.469
Total 150(100) 156(100)

Note: LSIL: Low-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion; HR-HPV : high-risk human papillomavirus; HSIL: High-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion; CIN: cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia