Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 31;11:e15998. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15998

Figure 3. Comparison of DRGs and spinal nerves between lesioned side of patients and healthy controls.

Figure 3

(A) The mean VDRG of DRGs in the lesioned side of patients were significantly more than that in the same side of healthy controls (19.2 ± 13.3 vs 14.85 ± 7.308, *p = 0.013). (B) The relative M value of DRGs in the lesioned side of patients were significantly more than that in the same side of healthy controls (2.03 ± 0.86 vs 1.42 ± 0.40, ****p < 0.001). (C) The mean Dmax of spinal nerves in the lesioned side of patients was significantly more than that in the same side of healthy controls (1.746 ± 0.47 vs 1.418 ± 0.34, ****p < 0.001). (D) The relative M value of spinal nerves in the lesioned side of patients was significantly more than that in the same side of healthy controls (1.96 ± 0.78 vs 1.04 ± 0.38, ****p < 0.001). Paired-samples t-tests was used to compare the data between two groups.