Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 22;3(8):100566. doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2023.100566

Table 1.

Prediction accuracy of mAb-Patch and the SA/nMIproxsum/PS method at different false positive rates

mAb Antigen region No. antigen residue No. epitope residue Method TP rate at FP rate of 0.05 TP rate at FP rate of 0.1 TP rate at FP rate of 0.15 TP rate at FP rate of 0.2 TP rate at FP rate of 0.25 TP rate at FP rate of 0.3
045-09 2B05 head 238 18 mAb-Patch 0.06∗ 0.17∗ 0.56∗ 0.61∗ 0.72∗ 0.72∗
SA/nMIproxsum/PS 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.11 0.22 0.22
047-09 4G02 head 238 18 mAb-Patch 0.22∗ 0.33∗ 0.56∗ 0.61∗ 0.67∗ 0.67∗
SA/nMIproxsum/PS 0.11 0.17 0.39 0.39 0.61 0.61
CR-9114 stalk 210 19 mAb-Patch 0.11 0.26 0.53∗ 0.68∗ 0.74∗ 0.84∗
SA/nMIproxsum/PS 0.32∗ 0.32∗ 0.42 0.47 0.63 0.74
FI6 stalk 210 19 mAb-Patch 0.06∗ 0.18∗ 0.47∗ 0.76∗ 0.82∗ 0.82∗
SA/nMIproxsum/PS 0.00 0.11 0.32 0.47 0.47 0.58

Asterisks (∗) indicate the better method performance.