Table 2.
Go.Data implementation characteristics
| Characteristics (n = 31)a | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Planned implementation scope | |
| National | 14 (45) |
| Subnational | 13 (42) |
| Institutionalb | 4 (13) |
| Institution Type | |
| Government (Ministry of Health, or Other) or public health institutec | 18 (58) |
| United Nationsor other multilateral agency | 10 (32) |
| University or research Center | 2 (6) |
| Nongovernmental organization | 1 (3) |
| - | |
| Primary planned use for Go.Data | |
| Case listing, contact listing and contact follow-up | 22 (71) |
| Research and protocols requiring detailed data collection on cases | 4 (13) |
| Case listing and contact listing (no follow-up) | 3 (10) |
| Data visualizations only | 2 (6) |
acollected from survey responses and de-duplicated by institution. Two in-depth interviews did not have a corresponding survey response
broll-out within individual institutions, such as hospitals, universities or research centers
cincluding local public health authorities/governmental bodies