Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 1;102(35):e35025. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035025

Table 1.

Comparison of chewing function between two groups.

Time Group n MABF/MMF (%) OT (s) BFDB (%) SDHue
Before treatment Study group 56 90.76 ± 6.30 0.49 ± 0.15 16.05 ± 1.52 0.86 ± 0.26
Control group 56 89.55 ± 6.46 0.48 ± 0.16 15.52 ± 1.77 0.83 ± 0.29
t 1.007 0.482 1.720 0.541
P value .316 .631 .088 .589
After treatment Study group 56 95.53 ± 3.30* 0.26 ± 0.10* 9.73 ± 1.37* 0.56 ± 0.24*
Control group 56 91.36 ± 4.18* 0.38 ± 0.14* 11.32 ± 1.36* 0.68 ± 0.28*
t 5.874 −5.218 −6.157 −2.365
P value <.001 <.001 <.001 .020

Compared with before treatment in this group.

BFDB = bite force distrbution balance, MABF/MMF = maximum area frame bite force/max movie force, OT = occlusion time, SDHue = standard deviation hue.

*

P < .05.