Table 4.
Comparison of Categorical Outcomes Between Higher and Lower Adherence Classes at 24 Months
Outcome | Higher Adherence (N = 142) |
Lower Adherencea (N = 44) |
Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Value |
Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anatomic failure | 28/119 (23.5%) | 9/34 (26%) | 0.85 (0.36 to 2.04) .72 |
0.9 (0.37 to 2.19) .81 |
Apical descent more than 1/3 into the vaginal canal | 15/116 (12.9%) | 6/33 (18%) | 0.67 (0.24 to 1.89) .45 |
0.68 (0.24 to 1.93) .47 |
Anterior prolapse | 13/116 (11.2%) | 5/33 (15%) | 0.71 (0.23 to 2.15) .54 |
0.74 (0.24 to 2.29) .60 |
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (“very much better” or “much better” vs other categories) | 81/120 (67.5%) | 22/34 (65%) | 1.13 (0.51 to 2.52) .76 |
1.12 (0.5 to 2.51) .79 |
Lower adherence used as reference group.