Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 24;26(9):1784–1797. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023000721

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of energy contribution (%) from foods classified by level of food processing; Japanese adults aged 20–69 years (n 388), 2013

Dish-level classification* Food-level classification
Mean sd UPF BPF MPF HPF UPF BPF MPF HPF
Dish-level classification*
  UPF 16·9 8·3 1·00 0·17 0·21 −0·71 0·79 −0·06 0·01 −0·46
  BPF 29·8 10·9 1·00 −0·04 −0·78 −0·04 0·84 −0·19 −0·61
  MPF 5·0 3·6 1·00 −0·31 0·07 −0·13 0·76 −0·20
  HPF 48·3 15·6 1·00 −0·41 −0·53 −0·04 0·71
Food-level classification
  UPF 23·4 7·3 1·00 −0·10 −0·02 −0·55
  BPF 36·8 9·6 1·00 −0·20 −0·70
  MPF 6·9 4·1 1·00 −0·18
  HPF 32·9 11·5 1·00

UPF, unprocessed or minimally processed foods; BPF, basic processed foods; MPF, moderately processed foods; HPF, highly processed foods.

*

Dishes prepared away from home (e.g. ready-made dishes from the supermarket and restaurant meals) were classified without recipe disaggregation.

Dishes prepared away from home (e.g. ready-made dishes from the supermarket and restaurant meals) were classified after disaggregation into food ingredients.

P < 0·0001 for all differences in the energy contribution of each food group between the dish- and food-based classification methods (paired t test).