Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2022 Oct 7;180:106338. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106338

Table 4.

Selection of Healthy Foods (Left) and High-Fat/High Sugar Foods (Right) as a Function of College Subjective Social Status and Stress.

Healthy Foods High-Fat/High-Sugar Foods

Unadjusted Model Adjusted for SES Unadjusted Model Adjusted for SES

B SE B SE B SE B SE
Constant 1.98*** 0.30 2.03*** 0.32 3.46*** 0.25 3.41*** 0.27
College SSS 0.30** 0.11 0.30** 0.11 −0.24** 0.09 −0.24** 0.09
Asian American −0.68 0.46 −0.81 0.48 0.02 0.38 0.14 0.40
Latino −0.34 0.37 −0.43 0.40 −0.45 0.31 −0.36 0.34
Other Ethnicity −0.81 0.81 −0.89 0.81 −0.75 0.71 −0.71 0.71
Gender −0.12 0.17 −0.10 0.17 −0.73*** 0.14 −0.73*** 0.15
Age 0.17 0.22 0.17 0.22 0.10 0.18 0.10 0.19
Parents’ Education 0.04 0.10 −0.01 0.09
Family Income −0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Personal Earnings −0.20 0.27 0.07 0.22

Note.

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001

SSS= subjective social status; SES = socioeconomic status. College SSS, Age, Parents’ Education, Family Income, and Personal Earnings were grand mean-centered. Family Income and Personal Income were divided by $10,000. Ethnicity was dummy-coded with European American as the reference group. Gender was effect-coded (−1 = male, 1 = female).