Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 28;110(10):1300–1308. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad160

Table 4.

Top 10 ranking for countries in 2019 based on the proportion of trials with a low risk of bias

Trials with low risk of bias (%)† No. of trials Rank on the basis of no. trials per 107 inhabitants Impact factor* Adequate generation of allocation Adequate concealed allocation Intention-to-treat analysis Adequate handling of drop-outs
1 UK 57.1 15 19 3.37 (2.02–21.94) 93.3 73.3 66.7 73.3
2 Netherlands 51.9 27 2 4.28 (2.72–14.78) 85.2 88.9 66.7 77.8
3 Finland 38.5 13 1 4.50 (2.48–10.48) 61.5 92.3 53.9 76.9
4 Korea 30.0 20 44 2.11 (1.47–4.12) 85.7 60.0 43.8 80.0
5 Germany 27.3 11 27 4.84 (3.18–6.26) 63.6 54.6 72.7 81.8
6 Spain 26.7 15 15 3.15 (2.20–5.68) 86.7 73.3 46.7 73.3
7 USA 22.0 50 24 3.61 (1.98–8.76) 60.0 70.0 36.0 70.0
8 Japan 20.0 35 16 2.39 (1.88–6.08) 54.3 51.4 34.3 77.1
9 China 16.0 81 39 2.24 (1.70–3.65) 59.3 51.9 21.1 55.6
10 Italy 12.5 16 17 2.00 (0.77–5.53) 62.5 56.3 25.0 68.8

*Values are median (i.q.r.) 2019 impact factors. Only countries with at least 10 published trials were analysed. †Trial with adequate generation of allocation, adequate concealment of allocation, intention-to-treat analyses, and adequate handling of drop-outs.