Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 5;14:5396. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40938-y

Table 1.

Comparison of key parameters with previously reported optoelectronic memories

Working principle Photosensitive material Programming voltage OPD [mW/cm2] Programming time Memory window Tested retention time Tested fatigue cycles Ref.
Photochromic DAEs 60 V 5 s >105 500 days 70 10
Tunneling MoS2 100 V 5 × 104 1 s >107 104 s 70 18
Tunneling SnS2 40 V 5 s >104 1
Tunneling PtS2 30 V 41 100 ms >103 19
Defects BTBT 120 V 40 12 s >106 2 × 104 s 11
Defects MoS2/PbS 40 V 0.027 5 s <3 104 s 2000 12
Defects WSe2 80 V 210 5 s 106 4.5 × 104 s 200 13
Defects Penance 60 V 71.59 120 s 104 100 days 3 14
Defects PDVT-10:N2200 40 V 5 1 s 105 2 × 104 s 500 15
Defects MoS2 80 V 501 10 s 107 104 s 250 16
Defects TiO2 50 V 1 30 s <2 104 s 17
PSD Ga2O3 4 V 0.16 1 s >106 2.6 × 105 s 500 This work

OPD optical power density.