Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 5;14:5403. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41271-0

Table 3.

Comparison of fine-mapping results between JAM single trait and flashfm multi-trait fine mapping

Region (Nearest genes) Trait JAM CS99 size flashfm CS99 size Size Reduction (%) JAM top SNPs JAM MPP of top SNPs flashfm top SNPs flashfm MPP of Top SNPs LD (r2) between JAM & flashfm top SNPs
16:56889590-57089590(CETP, HERPUD1) HDL 24 24 0 >10 all >0.9 >10 all >0.9 1
LDL 5 2 60 rs247616 0.501 rs183130 0.999 0.992
TC 24 23 4.2 rs1801706 0.925 rs1801706 0.983 1
TG 7 2 71.4 rs4783961 0.332 rs183130 0.999 0.470
16:71465787-71665787(CHSY4, ZNF19, TAT) HDL 8 4 50 rs78302875 0.406 rs78302875 0.920 1
LDL 43 33 23.3

rs77223082 rs144454811 rs72799815

rs72799820

all >0.9

rs77223082 rs144454811 rs72799815

rs72799820

all >0.9 1
TC 21 20 4.8

rs115532837 rs57422486

rs78302875 rs144454811 rs116408331 rs72799815

rs72799820

all >0.9

rs115532837 rs57422486

rs78302875 rs144454811 rs116408331 rs72799815

rs72799820

all >0.9 1
21:46753876-46975775(SLC19A1, COL18A1) HDL 18 16 11.1 rs116386571 0.863 rs116386571 0.999 1
TC 16 2 87.5 rs77974343 0.275 rs116386571 0.989 0.686
TG 17 8 52.9 rs116386571 1.0 rs116386571 1.0 1

CS99 size; 99 credible set size, MPP marginal posterior probability of causality.