Table 2.
OGTs and 16S rRNA gene GC contents of cultured marine Euryarchaeota and Thaumarchaeota
| Genome name | GC% | OGT (°C) | Isolated habitat | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus DSM 2095 | 58.8% | 65 | geothermally heated marine sediment | (Huber et al.)47 |
| Thermococcus kodakarensis KOD1 | 66.0% | 85 | marine hydrothermal vents | (Fukui et al.)48 |
| Thermococcus gammatolerans EJ3 | 66.1% | 88 | hydrothermal vent chimneys | (Zivanovic et al.)49 |
| Thermococcus onnurineus NA1 | 65.7% | 80 | hydrothermal vent sediment | (Lee et al.)50 |
| Thermococcus guaymasensis DSM11113 | 66.0% | 88 | Guaymas Basin | (Canganella et al.)51 |
| Thermococcus paralvinellae ES1 | 65.8% | 82 | deep-sea hydrothermal vent | (Pledger and Baross)52 |
| Thermococcus cleftensis CL1 | 65.8% | 85 | hydrothermal vent | (Jung et al.)53 |
| Thermococcus eurythermalis A501 | 66.0% | 85 | Guaymas Basin | (Zhao and Xiao)54 |
| Pyrococcus furiosus DSM3638 | 66.3% | 100 | shallow marine solfatara | (Fiala and Stetter)55 |
| Pyrococcus kukulkanii NCB100 | 66.5% | 105 | deep-sea hydrothermal vent | (Callac et al.)56 |
| Pyrococcus abyssi GE5 | 66.3% | 103 | deep-sea hydrothermal vent | (Erauso et al.)57 |
| Pyrococcus horikoshii OT3 | 66.3% | 98 | deep-sea hydrothermal vent | (Gonzalez et al.)58 |
| Aciduliprofundum boonei T469 | 62.0% | 70 | marine hydrothermal sediment | (Reysenbach et al.)59 |
| Ferroglobus placidus DSM 10642 | 65.7% | 85 | hydrothermal sediment | (Hafenbradl et al.)60 |
| Methanopyrus kandleri AV19 | 68.1% | 98 | deep-sea hydrothermal vent | (Kurr et al.)61 |
| Methanohalobium evestigatum Z-7303 | 55.9% | 50 | salt lagoon mud | (Ishida et al.)62 |
| Methanocaldococcus vulcanius M7 | 64.0% | 80 | deep sea hydrothermal vent chimney | (Jeanthon et al.)63 |
| Methanofervidicoccus abyssi HHB | 62.2% | 70 | Cayman hydrothermal vent | (Sakai et al.)64 |
| Methanocaldococcus jannaschii DSM2661 | 64.4% | 85 | deep-sea hydrothermal vent | (Bult et al.)65 |
| Methanocaldococcus infernus ME | 64.8% | 85 | deep-sea hydrothermal vent | (Jeanthon et al.)66 |
| Nitrosopumilus maritimus SCM1 | 52.6% | 30 | marine aquarium | (Martens-Habbena et al.)67 |
| Nitrosopumilus cobalaminigenes strain HCA1 | 52.8% | 32 | Hood Canal station P10 | (Qin et al.)68 |
| Nitrosopumilus ureiphilus strain PS0 | 52.5% | 31 | Puget Sound main basin | (Qin et al.)68 |
| Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus brevis CN25 | 51.9% | 22 | Marine water | (Santoro et al.)69 |
| Candidatus Nitrosomarinus catalina SPOT01 | 52.2% | 23 | Marine water | (Ahlgren et al.)70 |
| Candidatus Nitrosopumilus piranensis D3C | 52.4% | 32 | coastal surface water | (Bayer et al.)71 |
| Candidatus Nitrosopumilus koreensis AR1 | 52.5% | 25 | marine sediment | (Park et al., 2012)72 |
| Candidatus Nitrosopumilus adriaticus NF5 | 52.4% | 32 | adriatic sea | (Bayer et al.)71 |