Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 19;53(12):5625–5635. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722002835

Table 5.

Sensitivity, specificity, Youden's index, likelihood ratios and predictive values at different cut-off scores of the PHQ-2, PHQ-9 and PHQ-8 when compared to the CIDI

Threshold Score for PHQ-2 Sensitivity Specificity Youden's index LR + LR− PPV NPV
⩾ 1 0.94 0.53 0.47 2.00 0.12 0.10 1.00
⩾ 2 0.88 0.70 0.57 2.89 0.18 0.13 0.99
⩾ 3 0.68 0.85 0.54 4.68 0.37 0.19 0.98
⩾ 4 0.55 0.92 0.47 6.63 0.49 0.24 0.97
Threshold Score for PHQ-8 Sensitivity Specificity Youden's index LR +  LR- PPV NPV
⩾ 5 0.89 0.70 0.59 2.96 0.16 0.14 0.99
⩾ 6 0.89 0.76 0.65 3.74 0.15 0.17 0.99
⩾ 7 0.86 0.81 0.68 4.65 0.17 0.20 0.99
⩾ 8 0.80 0.85 0.65 5.47 0.24 0.23 0.99
⩾ 9 0.73 0.89 0.62 6.84 0.31 0.27 0.98
⩾ 10 0.70 0.91 0.62 7.89 0.32 0.30 0.98
⩾ 11 0.66 0.93 0.59 9.80 0.37 0.35 0.98
⩾ 12 0.64 0.95 0.59 13.70 0.38 0.42 0.98
⩾ 13 0.59 0.96 0.55 15.59 0.43 0.46 0.98
⩾ 14 0.52 0.97 0.50 19.44 0.49 0.51 0.97
⩾ 15 0.48 0.98 0.46 21.69 0.53 0.54 0.97
Threshold Score for PHQ-9 Sensitivity Specificity Youden's index LR +  LR− PPV NPV
⩾ 5 0.94 0.64 0.59 2.65 0.09 0.10 1.00
⩾ 6 0.91 0.72 0.63 3.21 0.12 0.12 0.99
⩾ 7 0.86 0.78 0.64 3.89 0.18 0.14 0.99
⩾ 8 0.86 0.82 0.68 4.81 0.17 0.17 0.99
⩾ 9 0.80 0.86 0.66 5.55 0.23 0.19 0.99
⩾ 10 0.74 0.89 0.63 6.73 0.29 0.22 0.99
⩾ 11 0.69 0.90 0.59 7.16 0.35 0.23 0.99
⩾ 12 0.66 0.92 0.58 8.47 0.37 0.26 0.98
⩾ 13 0.60 0.94 0.54 9.90 0.43 0.30 0.98
⩾ 14 0.51 0.95 0.46 1.10 0.51 0.30 0.98
⩾ 15 0.49 0.96 0.44 11.45 0.54 0.33 0.98

Note. LR+, Positive Likelihood Ratio; LR−, Negative Likelihood Ratio; PPV, Positive Predictive Value; PPN, Negative Predictive Value. Bold shade indicate optimal cut-off value according to Youden´s index for PHQ-2, PHQ-8 and PHQ-9.