Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 26;53(12):5709–5716. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722002938

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and intercorrelations of the measured variables

M s.d. Med. Min. Max. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1. Conspiracy beliefs W1 1.72 0.54 1.44 1.00 4.89
2. Conspiracy beliefs W2 1.77 0.69 1.33 1.00 4.44 0.69
3. Conspiracy beliefs W3 1.73 0.65 1.44 1.00 4.89 0.70 0.77
4. Physical distancing W1 7.99 2.08 8.50 0.00 10.00 −0.14 −0.28 −0.29
5. Physical distancing W2 7.22 2.22 7.75 0.00 10.00 −0.20 −0.43 −0.42 0.55
6. Physical distancing W3 7.79 2.12 8.25 0.00 10.00 −0.17 −0.42 −0.37 0.54 0.66
7. Support for policy W1 6.85 2.30 7.00 0.00 10.00 −0.13 −0.09 −0.11 0.60 0.43 0.36
8. Support for policy W2 4.52 2.32 4.40 0.00 10.00 −0.06 −0.12 −0.19 0.37 0.54 0.39 0.55
9. Support for policy W3 6.02 2.35 6.40 0.00 10.00 −0.12 −0.23 −0.29 0.34 0.45 0.56 0.45 0.54
10. Perceived danger W1 3.60 0.86 3.67 1.00 5.00 −0.22 −0.25 −0.25 0.39 0.51 0.34 0.48 0.40 0.30
11. Perceived danger W2 3.55 0.97 3.67 1.00 5.00 −0.24 −0.39 −0.42 0.32 0.59 0.53 0.37 0.50 0.49 0.76
12. Perceived danger W3 3.72 0.98 4.00 1.00 5.00 −0.28 −0.39 −0.40 0.42 0.54 0.57 0.42 0.45 0.58 0.62 0.73

Note: Conspiracy beliefs and perceived danger are measured on five-point scales (1–5), physical distancing and support for lockdown policy are measured on 11-point scales (0–10). All correlations were significant (p < 0.001).