Table 2.
Results of primary analyses: associations between MDD and EMOTICOM summary affective cognition outcome variables
| Mposterior | 95% CI | pMCMC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Symptoms | |||
| BERT, affective bias | −0.002 | [−0.019 to 0.014] | 0.79 |
| FAGN, affective bias | 0.007 | [−0.009 to 0.026] | 0.45 |
| CGT, risk adjustment win | −0.019 | [−0.038 to −0.003] | 0.03* |
| CGT, risk adjustment loss | −0.005 | [−0.023 to 0.010] | 0.54 |
| MDD-r v. Control | |||
| BERT, affective bias | 0.027 | [−0.120 to 0.159] | 0.70 |
| FAGN, affective bias | 0.059 | [−0.084 to 0.201] | 0.41 |
| CGT, risk adjustment win | −0.022 | [−0.181 to 0.106] | 0.76 |
| CGT, risk adjustment loss | −0.005 | [−0.149 to 0.131] | 0.96 |
BERT, Bristol Emotion Recognition Task; CGT, adapted Cambridge Gambling Task; CI, credible interval; FAGN, Face Go/No-Go; MCMC, Markov Chain Monte Carlo; MDD-r, remitted from major depressive disorder.
*pMCMC < 0.05.