Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 16;66(5):562–572. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2022.0229

Table 2.

Comparison of the responder group and the non-responder group of bevacizumab therapy after radiation necrosis

Variable Responder (n=36) Non-responder (n=9) p-value
Gender
 Male 18 (50.0) 5 (55.6) 1.000
 Female 18 (50.0) 4 (44.4)
Age at first BEV cycle (years) 55.3±11.0 55.3±7.8 0.989
Diagnosis 0.482
 Glioma 15 (41.7) 5 (55.6)
  Grade IV 3 0
  Grade III 6 4
  Grade II 6 1
 Non-glioma 21 (58.3) 4 (44.4)
  Cerebral metastasis 12 3
  Others 9 1
Prior brain tumor surgery 20 (55.6) 5 (55.6) 1.000
Prior chemotherapy 30 (83.3) 8 (88.9) 1.000
Prior immunotherapy 8 (22.2) 0 (0.0) 0.179
Early termination of BEV, <4 cycle 8 (22.2) 4 (44.4) 0.219
Latency period from last radiation to diagnosis of radiation necrosis (months) 13.1±12.8 11.6±18.6 0.772
Time interval between diagnosis of radiation necrosis and BEV treatment (days) 89.4±108.6 107.3±108.8 0.660
Perfusion MRI, rCBV 0.254
 No increase 24 (66.7) 4 (44.4)
 Equivocal 10 (27.8) 5 (55.6)
 Not checked 2 (5.6) 0 (0.0)
DWI/ADC MRI <0.001*
 No restriction 27 (75.0) 0 (0.0)
 Restriction 9 (25.0) 9 (100.0)
Lesion quotient, T1-CE/T2-FLAIR ratio 0.31±0.18 0.45±0.29 0.092

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

*

p<0.05.

BEV : bevacizumab, MRI : magnetic resonance imaging, rCBV : relative cerebral blood volume, DWI : diffusion-weighted image, ADC : apparent diffusion coefficient, T1-CE : T1-weighted contrast-enhanced, T2-FLAIR : T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery