Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 24;14:1207075. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1207075

TABLE 2.

Results of pairwise meta-analyses for the MMSE score.

Comparative Reference medications Number of studies Number of controls Number of patients MD/OR 95% CI I2 p
Donepezil Placebo 7 390 396 2.21 [-0.47, 4.88] 0 0.001
MEM Placebo 9 284 396 1.05 [0.18, 1.79] 0 0.001
RIV Placebo 9 326 404 0.32 [-0.61, 1.35] 0 0.009
Acupuncture Placebo 6 338 339 1.99 [1.09, 2.88] 0 0.0001
NBP Placebo 7 264 264 4.89 [4.14, 5.63] 0 0.0001
Nimodipine Placebo 2 32 33 2.13 [1.52, 2.75] 0 0.0001
Citicoline Placebo 2 82 86 1.63 [1.28, 1.98] NA 0.0001
NBP + Oxiracetam Placebo 6 264 265 1.26 [0.97, 1.56] 0 0.0001
TCM Placebo 6 139 141 1.30 [0.89, 6.55] 0 0.0001
Cell therapies Placebo 4 136 137 2.80 [1.24, 4.37] 0 0.0004
Oxiracetam Placebo 4 101 101 1.34 [0.88, 1.8] 0 0.01
Antipatient angents Placebo 1 40 40 1.73 [0.91,3.29] 0 0.08
Oxygen Placebo 24 931 943 4.00 [3.28, 4.73] 0 0.00001
Olacetam Placebo 42 1864 1851 6.09 [4.55, 7.62] 0 0.01

CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference; OR, risk ratio; I2, heterogeneity; MEM, memantine; RIV, rivastigmine; NBP, DL-3-n-Butylphthalide.