Figure 6:
![Comparison of all-cause mortality between coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and standard of care (SOC) arms. Forest plot shows the risk ratio (RR) of all-cause mortality for CCTA arms compared with SOC arms in participants with acute chest pain, stratified by group (group 1 = low-to-intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome [ACS] and group 2 = high risk for ACS). The overall RR was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.59, 1.58). The size of central markers reflects the weight of each study. While all studies are listed, some of them have not studied all outcomes, which explains the missing values.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=Click%20on%20image%20to%20zoom&p=PMC3&id=10483255_ryct.230022.fig6.jpg)
Comparison of all-cause mortality between coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and standard of care (SOC) arms. Forest plot shows the risk ratio (RR) of all-cause mortality for CCTA arms compared with SOC arms in participants with acute chest pain, stratified by group (group 1 = low-to-intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome [ACS] and group 2 = high risk for ACS). The overall RR was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.59, 1.58). The size of central markers reflects the weight of each study. While all studies are listed, some of them have not studied all outcomes, which explains the missing values.