Figure 9:
![Comparison of costs between coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and standard of care (SOC) arms. Forest plot shows the ratio of means (ROM) for costs (U.S. dollars) for CCTA arms compared with SOC arms in participants with acute chest pain, stratified by group (group 1 = low-to-intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome [ACS] and group 2 = high risk for ACS). The overall ROM was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.95). The size of central markers reflects the weight of each study. While all studies are listed, some of them have not studied all outcomes, which explains the missing values.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=Click%20on%20image%20to%20zoom&p=PMC3&id=10483255_ryct.230022.fig9.jpg)
Comparison of costs between coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and standard of care (SOC) arms. Forest plot shows the ratio of means (ROM) for costs (U.S. dollars) for CCTA arms compared with SOC arms in participants with acute chest pain, stratified by group (group 1 = low-to-intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome [ACS] and group 2 = high risk for ACS). The overall ROM was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.95). The size of central markers reflects the weight of each study. While all studies are listed, some of them have not studied all outcomes, which explains the missing values.