. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 7.

Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2019 Dec 12;216:222–228. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.11.057

Table 2.

Differences in Coping Strategies between CHR and Healthy Control Individuals

	CHR M (SD)	HC M (SD)	Test Statistic	p value
Engagement Coping
Problem Solving	1.16 (.63)	1.13 (.86)	t (147) = .17	.87
Emotion Regulation	1.33 (1.96)	.99 (.76)	t (147) = 1.39	.17
Positive Thinking	1.04 (.73)	.99 (.73)	t (147) =.42	.67
Cognitive Change	1.27 (.70)	1.27 (.81)	t (147) = −.04	.97
Acceptance	1.45 (.67)	1.17 (.64)	t (147) = 2.65	< .01
Distraction	.92 (.66)	.78 (.72)	t (147) = 1.21	.23
Disengagement Coping
Avoidance	1.18 (.71)	.72 (.68)	t (147) = 4.09	< .001
Denial	.70 (.50)	.46 (.42)	t (147) = 3.08	< .01
Wishful Thinking	.99 (.77)	.49 (.57)	t (147) = 4.54	< .001

Note. CHR = Clinical high risk. HC = Healthy control; Coping items are on a scale of 0 – 3.