Skip to main content
Access Microbiology logoLink to Access Microbiology
. 2023 Sep 7;5(8):acmi000637.v3. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000637.v3

Risk factors for acquiring Acinetobacter baumannii infection in the intensive care unit: experience from a Moroccan hospital

Elmostafa Benaissa 1,2,*, Elmehdi Belouad 1, Adil Maleb 3, Mostafa Elouennass 1,2
PMCID: PMC10484316  PMID: 37691842

Abstract

Introduction.

Acinetobacter species are non-fermenting and ubiquitous Gram-negative coccobacilli, which in recent years have become the leading cause of healthcare-associated infections worldwide. Our objective here was to study the epidemiology and risk factors associated with Acinetobacter baumannii infections in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods.

This retrospective case-control study was conducted collaboratively between the Medical Bacteriology Department and the two ICUs of the Military Hospital of Instruction Mohammed V-Rabat over a 3 month period.

Results.

We included 180 patients, of whom 60 had A. baumannii infection. We observed a male predominance in both matched groups, with a sex ratio of 1.6. The median age was 67 years [interquartile range (IQR) 59.5–77]. The median length of stay in the ICU before infection was 8.5 days (IQR 5–14). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the risk factors statistically associated with A. baumannii infection at the ICU level as follows: duration of invasive procedures >7 days [odds ratio (OR)=1.02], parenteral nutrition (OR=3.514), mechanical ventilation (OR=3.024), imipenem (OR=18.72), colistin (OR=5.645), probabilistic antibiotic therapy >4 days (OR=9.063) and neoplastic pathology (OR=5.727).

Conclusion.

Based on our results, it can be inferred that shortening the duration of stay in the resuscitation setting, implementing rational use of medical devices and optimizing antibiotic therapy could decrease the incidence of these infections.

Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii, infection, intensive care units, Risk factors

Data Summary

No data were reused or generated for this study.

Introduction

Acinetobacter is a ubiquitous, non-fermenting Gram-negative coccobacillus that has become the leading cause of healthcare-associated infections worldwide in recent years due to its ability to survive in the hospital environment and to acquire resistance to commonly used antibiotics. It has been implicated in a wide range of conditions including skin and soft tissue infections, pneumonia, osteomyelitis and bacteraemia.

The emergence of multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complicates the therapeutic process and contributes directly to the increase in mortality and indirectly to the increase in length of stay and hospitalization costs. In Moroccan intensive care units (ICUs), Acinetobacter species accounted for 24.85 % of all isolates and 31.5 % of all Gram-negative bacilli [1]. A recently published study demonstrated that the clonal spread of A. baumannii clinical isolates was related to those isolated from the hospital environment in two Moroccan ICUs [2]. The same research team also reported that clinical isolates of A. baumannii were more resistant to antiseptics and disinfectants than those from the environment [3].

This species has also become a matter of great concern due to its extraordinary ability to acquire resistance to commonly used antibiotics. Polymyxins remain the last therapeutic option but the emergence of colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates has been reported worldwide [4]. Over the last decade, antibiotic resistance rates of A. baumannii strains have increased from 78.3 to 100 % for piperacillin/tazobactam, from 68.7 to 100 % for ceftazidime, from 31.4 to 87.7 % for imipenem, from 27.3 to 100 % for amikacin, and from 77.8 to 100 % for ciprofloxacin in Moroccan ICUs [1, 5, 6].

According to the literature, the recognized risk factors associated with A. baumannii infections are: invasive procedures, previous hospitalization, host factors, length of stay in the ICU and previous use of broad-spectrum antibiotics [4]. These infections are associated with mortality ranging from 28.3 to 84.3 % in the ICU [5, 7].

Independent predictors of mortality vary from country to country and region to region, and may be related to ICU-acquired infections, ineffective empirical antibiotic therapy, antibiotic resistance, immunosuppression, septic shock, medical device use and steroid use [7–10]. Local data are monocentric and fragmentary and sometimes without separation between services. It is in this context that we conducted this study with the objective of studying the epidemiology and risk factors associated with A. baumannii infections in the ICU of the Mohammed V Military Training Hospital.

Methods

Study design and study site

This is a retrospective case-control study conducted in collaboration between the medical bacteriology department and the two resuscitation departments of the Mohammed V military training hospital in Rabat over a 3 month period from June to September 2022.

Study population

The original population consisted of patients hospitalized in the two series of medical and surgical resuscitation departments of the Military Hospital Mohammed V Rabat and having a positive biological workup for diagnostic purposes.

For our case-control study, 60 cases and 120 controls were randomly matched in a 1 : 2 ratio. Cases and controls were selected by including patients aged over 15 years, hospitalized in the two ICUs of the same facility and during the same study period. We excluded patients aged under 15 years of age, duplicates and patients whose records were lost.

Cases were defined as any patient infected with A. baumannii according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Infection was considered acquired in the ICU if it occurred 48 h after admission to the ICU. Controls were defined as patients hospitalized in the ICU without A. baumannii infections. Clinical and microbiological data were collected from patient records and the laboratory information system using a questionnaire with the following variables: age, gender, patient’s origin, underlying comorbidities, invasive procedures, previous probabilistic antibiotic therapy, notion of prior hospitalization up to 1 year before inclusion, length of stay in an ICU setting, bacterial co-infection, microbiological data (antibiogram, sampling site, type of sampling) and evolution.

Microbiological method

Identification of bacterial isolates was based on culture, morphological and biochemical identification characteristics. Biochemical identification was performed using API20NE ready-to-use galleries (bioMérieux).

Antibiotic susceptibility was studied using the Mueller Hilton agar diffusion method by using OXOID-type antibiotic discs and interpreted according to the recommendations of EUCAST 2022. The interpretation was performed using the Adagio Biorad system. Quality control of the antibiotic susceptibility test was performed with Escherichia coli strain ATCC 25922.

For colistin, determination of the MIC was performed by the microdilution method using the sensititre COL* plate (Thermo Scientific Wellwash; RRID:SCR_020569) from an 18–24 h culture. Interpretation of the results was performed according to EUCAST 2022 recommendations.

Statistical methods

Data were entered into Microsoft Excel, RRID:SCR_016137. Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi version 2.3.4. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean±sd or median (interquartile range – IQR) and qualitative variables as number and percentage. Comparison of qualitative variables was performed by Pearson’s and Fisher’s chi-square exact tests, and comparison of quantitative variables was performed by Student’s t-test and Mann–Whitney U-test according to the normality of the distribution. Multivariate analysis was performed using a logistic regression model.

Measures of association were calculated with 95 % confidence intervals by setting a threshold of statistical significance at P≤0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics

We included 180 patients meeting the eligibility criteria, 60 of whom had A. baumannii infection. We noted a male predominance in both matched groups with a sex ratio of 1.6. The median age of our population was 67 years (IQR 59.5–77). The median length of stay in the ICU before infection was 8.5 days (IQR 5–14).

Among 420 patients hospitalized in the ICU during the study period, 60 developed A. baumannii infection. The incidence of A. baumannii care-associated infections was 14.2 per 100 patients.

Pulmonary infections were frequent in 60 % (46/60), followed by bacteraemia in 23 % (14/60), urinary tract infections in 20 % (12/60) and surgical site infections in 8.3 % (5/60). The reason for hospitalization in our series was dominated by respiratory distress in 30 % (55/180), followed by septic shock in 10 % (18/180), stroke in 9.4 % (17/180), postoperative management in 9.4 % (17/180), disturbed consciousness in 7.2 % (13/180) and haemodynamic instability in 5.5 % (10/180).

Co-infection was found in 75 % (45/60). The most responsive co-isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae in 18.3 % (11/60), followed by Escherichia coli in 11.7 % (7/60), Enterococcus sp. in 10 % (6/60), Corynebacterium spp. in 8.3 % (5/60) and Enterobcater cloacae in 8.3 % (5/60) (Table 1).

Table 1.

The distribution of bacterial co-infection in patients with A. baumannii infection

Species

No.

Percentage

Klebsiella pneumoniae

11

18.3 %

Escherichia coli

7

11.7 %

Enterococcus sp.

6

10 %

Enterobacter cloacae

5

8.3 %

Corynebacterium spp.

5

8.3 %

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

4

6.7 %

Serratia sp.

2

3.3 %

Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus

2

3.3 %

Haemophilus influenzae

1

1.7 %

Streptococcus agalactia

1

1.7 %

Staphylococcus aureus

1

1.7 %

Study of the resistance of A. baumannii isolates to antibiotics showed resistance rates of 100 % for ticarcillin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, cefepime, ceftazidime, gentamicin, amikacin, imipeneme and ciprofloxacin. Tetracylin and minocyclin were resistant in 94 and 74% of isolates respectively. All isolates of A. baumannii were susceptible to colistin. Following the results of the resistance study, we deduced that all our isolates were represented by extremely drug-resistant A. baumannii (XDR) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Antibiotic resistance profile of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates.

Risk factors for A. baumannii infection in the resuscitation setting

Variables found to be statistically significant in univariate analysis were: disorders of consciousness, duration of invasive procedures >7 days, previous use of central venous catheters, arterial catheters, mechanical ventilation, parenteral nutrition, co-infection, probabilistic antibiotic therapy, probabilistic antibiotic therapy >4 days, previous use of colistin, imipenem, documented antibiotic therapy, clinical course, length of stay in the ICU and length of stay in the ICU >14 days (Table 2).

Table 2.

Results of univariate analysis of potential risk factors for Acinetobacter baumannii infection in the resuscitation setting

Characteristic

Cases (n=60)

Controls (n=120)

P

OR

95 % CI

Male sex

37(62 %)

78 (65 %)

0.661

0.866

0.785–1.498

Age in years, mean±sd and median (IQR)

67.2±13.4

69 (60.5–77)

0.520

0.994

0.260–1.013

Duration of invasive procedures in days, median (IQR)

13(8.75–18.3)

8 (5–10)

<0.001

1.134

0.067–1.185

Length of stay in the intensive care unit in days, median (IQR)

14 (9–19)

7 (5–10)

<0.001

1.132

0.068–0.181

Length of stay in intensive care in days >14 days

31 (51.7 %)

16 (13.3 %)

<0.001

6.948

1.21–8.669

Stay in another department

33 (55 %)

70 (58.3 %)

0.670

0.873

0.761–1.489

Reason for hospitalization

Respiratory distress

12 (20 %)

21 (17.5 %)

0.647

0.853

0.839–1.522

Consciousness disorder

8 (13.3 %)

5 (4.17 %)

0.033

3.538

0.99–4.428

Haemodynamic instability

4 (6.7 %)

6 (5 %)

0.646

1.357

1.000–1.610

Aceto-ketotic decompensation

3 (5 %)

4 (3.3 %)

0.588

1.526

1.11–1.953

Cerebral vascular accidents

6 (10 %)

11 (9.2 %)

0.857

1.101

0.951–2.143

COVID-19

4 (6.7 %)

3 (2.5 %)

0.190

2.786

0.506–3.555

Meningitis syndrome

5 (1.7 %)

3 (2.5 %)

0.091

3.545

0.201–2.732

Post-operative management

3 (5 %)

14 (11.7 %)

0.161

0.398

2.208–0.368

Sepsis

3 (5 %)

13 (10.8 %)

0.599

0.748

1.371–0.791

Status epilepticus

2 (3.3 %)

1 (0.83 %)

0.732

1.234

0.421–2.156

Invasive procedures

Duration of invasive procedures >7 days

48

75

0.019

2.400

0.143–1.608

Central venous catheter

58

66

0.05

4.462

0.009–6.000

Arterial catheter

45

55

˂0.001

3.545

0.580–4.952

Urinary catheter

57

112

0.661

1.357

0.06–1.670

Nasogastric catheter

47

49

 0.351

 1.021

 0.1-1.423

Mechanical ventilation

49

72

0.004

2.970

0.339–3.837

Parenteral nutrition

27

19

˂0.001

4.349

0.764–6.176

Dialysis

2

2

0.483

2.034

1.27–3.695

Co-infection

44

60

0.003

2.750

0.337–3.686

Recent surgery

3

7

0.818

0.850

0.55–1.227

Probabilistic antibiotic therapy

59

106

0.05

7.792

1.20–9.107

Probabilistic antibiotic therapy >4 days

52

89

0.05

2.264

0.032–3.666

Previous use of penicillins+inhibitors

10

25

0.506

0.760

0.084–1.535

Use of C3Gs and C4Gs

26

53

0.915

0.967

0.659–1.591

Use of aminoglycosides

22

43

0.913

1.037

0.608–1.680

Use of flouroquinolones

9

13

0.423

1.452

0.540–2.286

Use of colistin

38

4

˂0.001

50.091

20.79–60.04

Use of glycopeptides

4

6

0.646

1.357

1.00–1.610

Use of imipenem

29

39

0.04

1.943

0.029–2.298

Documented antibiotic therapy

28

3

˂0.001

34.125

8.28–48.783

Deaths

18

19

0.029

1.439

0.562–2.085

Underlying pathologies

38

91

0.08

0.550

0.268–1.074

Diabetes

19

37

0.909

1.040

0.629–1.707

Hypertension

20

44

0.660

0.864

0.799–1.506

Cerebral vascular accidents

4

6

0.646

1.357

0.10–1.610

Chronic smoking

7

17

0.642

0.800

0.163–1.718

Heart disease

4

8

1.00

1.00

0.24–1.242

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

1

4

0.529

0.492

0.024–1.503

Cancer

11

12

0.119

2.020

0.182–2.588

Epilepsy

3

2

0.222

3.105

0.684–3.950

*CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

C3Gs and C4Gs, 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins; CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, Coronavirus disease 2019; IQR, interquartile range; OR, odds ratio; SD, standard deviation.

Therefore, multivariate logistic regression analysis with the ‘backward’ top-down variable selection method identified risk factors statistically associated with A. baumannii infection at the ICU level: duration of invasive procedures >7 days [odds ratio (OR)=1.02], parenteral nutrition (OR=3.514), mechanical ventilation (OR=3.024), imipenem (OR=18.72), colistin (OR=5.645), probabilistic antibiotic therapy >4 days (OR=9.063) and neoplastic pathology (OR=5.727) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with Acinetobacter baumannii infection

Parameter

P

OR

95 % CI

Duration of invasive procedures ˃7 days

0.011

1.42

0.825–1.900

Parenteral nutrition

0.019

3.514

0.591–6.528

Imipenem

0.006

18.725

1.495–8.970

Mechanical ventilation

0.031

3.024

0.873–6.320

Colistin

˂0.001

5.645

5.07–16.811

Probabilistic antibiotic therapy ˃4 days

0.001

9.063

3.538–14.686

Neoplastic pathology

0.006

5.727

1.816–10.884

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Risk factors associated with mortality

Regarding the mortality rate, 30 % of patients infected with A. baumannii died during their hospitalization compared to 16 % in the control groups (P<0.029).

Univariate analysis suggested that the following were risk factors for mortality: A. baumannii infection, duration of probabilistic antibiotic therapy <4 days, chronic smoking and neoplastic pathology (Table 4).

Table 4.

Results of univariate analysis of risk factors for mortality in patients infected with Acinetobacter baumannii

Characteristic

Deaths (n=37)

Survivors (n=143)

P

OR

95 % CI

Male sex

28

87

0.098

0.499

0.52–1.128

Age in years, median (IQR)

67 (60–76)

68 (60–76)

0.927

0.999

0.024–1.022

Duration of invasive procedures in days, median (IQR)

9 (5–17)

9 (6–12)

0.850

0.996

0.047–1.003

Length of stay in the intensive care unit in days, median (IQR)

9 (5–18)

8 (5.5–13.5)

0.956

0.999

0.043–1.04

Length of stay in intensive care in days >14 days

11

36

0.574

1.26

0.571–2.03

Stay in another department

21

82

0.949

1.02

0.706–1.754

Reason for hospitalization

Respiratory distress

13

42

0.498

1.30

0.501–2.03

Consciousness disorder

4

9

0.350

1.80

0.647–2.83

Aceto-ketotic decompensation

1

6

0.678

1.58

1.693–2.60

Cerebral vascular accidents

2

15

0.355

2.05

0.804–2.24

COVID-19

2

5

0.595

1.58

1.226–2.14

Meningitis syndrome

1

7

0.570

1.85

1.510–2.74

Post-operative management

3

14

0.756

1.23

1.096–1.51

Sepsis

6

12

0.165

2.11

0.307–3.80

Invasive procedures

Duration of invasive procedures >7 days

25

98

0.911

1.05

0.729–1.818

Central venous catheter

31

131

0.165

0.473

0.80–1.307

Arterial catheter

21

79

0.869

1.06

0.668–1.791

Urinary catheter

33

136

0.192

2.35

0.429–3.14

Nasogastric catheter

20

76

0.921

0.964

0.762–1.689

Mechanical ventilation

22

99

0.261

1.53

0.318–2.12

Parenteral nutrition

7

39

0.302

1.61

0.427–2.38

Co-infection

24

80

0.329

1.45

0.377–2.13

Recent surgery

1

9

0.410

2.42

1.215–3.98

Probabilistic antibiotic therapy >4 days

24

117

0.029

2.4

0.093–3.69

Previous use of penicillins+inhibitors

11

24

0.08

2.10

0.089–2.57

Use of C3Gs and C4Gs

14

65

0.406

1.37

0.427–2.06

Use of aminoglycosides

15

50

0.530

1.27

0.503–1.978

Use of flouroquinolones

3

19

0.396

1.74

0.723–2.83

Use of colistin

9

33

0.873

1.07

0.777–2.915

Use of glycopeptides

1

9

0.410

2.42

0.215–2.98

Use of macrolides

2

4

0.439

0.504

0.42–1.05

Use of imipeneme

14

54

0.993

1

0.742–1.749

Documented antibiotic therapy

9

22

0.203

1.77

0.308–2.45

Acinetobacter baumannii infection

18

42

0.029

2.28

0.085–2.56

Underlying pathologies

26

103

0.883

1.09

0.708–2.881

Diabetes

12

44

0.846

1.08

0.698–1.851

Hypertension

10

54

0.227

1.64

0.307–2.29

Cerebral vascular accidents

2

8

0.964

1.04

0.557–2.63

Chronic smoking

9

15

0.032

2.74

0.087–3.93

Heart disease

1

10

0.731

1.32

0.289–2.89

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2

2

0.293

2.67

0.846–3.81

Cancer

9

14

0.022

2.96

0.154–3.02

C3Gs and C4Gs, 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporins; CI, confidence interval; COVID-1, Coronavirus disease 2019; IQR, interquartile range; OR, odds ratio; SD, standard deviation.

However, multivariate logistic regression with the variable selection method considering those risk factors with a P˂0.05, those with a P<0.3 and also those recognized in the literature associated with mortality by A. baumannii infection showed that A. baumannii infection, sepsis and probabilistic antibiotic therapy <4 days were significant independent predictors (P<0.005) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for mortality in patients infected with Acinetobacter baumannii

Parameter

P

OR

95 % CI

Acinetobacter baumannii infection

0.015

2.43

0.444–4.133

Sepsis

0.030

2.17

0.181–3.477

Probabilistic antibiotic therapy ˂4 days

0.038

2.07

0.073–2.557

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Discussion

A. baumanni is one of the most common opportunistic agents causing healthcare-associated infections, especially in the ICU setting. In the absence of incontrovertible data on A. baumannii infections, it is difficult to accurately estimate the incidence and thus the prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections including multidrug-resistant A. baumannii.

In our study, the incidence of A. baumannii infections in the ICU setting was 14.2 %. Our rate is higher than that reported by Jean et al. (8.4 %), and that reported in India (10%) and in Mexico in cancer patients (4.6 %). This could be explained by differences in the application of hygiene and infection control measures, in particular hand hygiene practices and decontamination of the hospital environment [11].

In our study, independent risk factors for A. baumannii infection can be classified into three categories: those related to increased length of stay in the ICU, those related to the use of invasive medical devices (use of central venous catheters or mechanical ventilation and procedures ≥7 days), and those related to previous drug treatment (probabilistic antibiotic therapy >4 days, imipenem, colistin).

According to the literature, risk factors vary between countries and regions. The most frequently reported risk factors were previous exposure to carbapenems and previous antibiotic therapy [12–17].

A meta-analysis of 18 studies identified risk factors for multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. Male gender, exposure to surgery, central venous catheter, mechanical ventilation, previous antibiotic therapy and prolonged hospitalization were considered as risk factors for multidrug-resistant infections [18]. Following our multivariate analysis, mechanical ventilation, use of probabilistic antibiotic therapy >4 days, parenteral nutrition, duration of invasive procedures >7 days, colistin, imipenem and neoplastic pathologies were independent risk factors. Our case differs from previous studies in case definitions, anatomical site of infection, antibiotic treatment protocols and antibiotic resistance profile.

Mechanical ventilation is the major factor in the emergence of nosocomial pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii . In China, a retrospective incidence study showed that the use of mechanical ventilation led to a 2.5-fold higher risk of developing a nosomial infection with multidrug-resistant bacteria [19]. In Greece, a prospective study showed that mechanical ventilation was a risk factor independently associated with the occurrence of healthcare-associated infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria. In our study, multivariate analysis showed that the use of mechanical ventilation increased the risk of acquiring healthcare-associated infections with multi-drug-resistant A. baumannii by three times compared to control patients [20]. Intravascular devices are essential to modern medicine in the management of patients but their presence is not without infectious risk. This explains why A. baumannii isolates are frequent in respiratory infections and bacteraemia.

Our data also showed that imipenem and colistin increased the risk of A. baumannii infection by 18 and five times, respectively.

Prior exposure to antibiotics has been identified as a risk factor for multidrug-resistant bacterial infection in several studies [21, 22]. This highlights the importance of rational use of antibiotics. In our study, probabilistic antibiotic therapy longer than 4 days increased the risk of acquiring A. baumannii infection nine times compared to the control group.

Furthermore, our data showed that neoplastic pathology increased the risk of A. baumannii infection by 5.7 times in the cases compared with in the control group.

In the present study, the observed mortality rate (30%) is comparable to the literature, which ranges from 29 to 63 % [23–25]. According to our study the risk of death is almost two times higher in patients infected with A. baumannii than in controls.

The literature is conflicting regarding the impact of bacterial resistance on mortality. A very high mortality rate has been reported in patients infected with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) enterobacteria, multidrug-resistant A. baumannii and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa , while some studies have reported similar mortality rates for cases and controls. Several studies over the past two decades have demonstrated that inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy is an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with multidrug-resistant bacteria [26–36].

Septic shock was statistically associated with two-fold greater mortality. Previous studies have shown that septic shock remains the leading cause of death in patients with multi-drug-resistant bacterial infection in the ICU and is a risk factor for mortality with inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy [37]. Our data also showed that probabilistic antibiotic therapy of less than 4 days increases the risk of mortality by 2.07. Being infected with multidrug-resistant A. baumannii has been shown to be associated with a 2.43-fold increased risk of mortality.

Conclusion

Our data show that reducing the duration of ICU stay, rational use of medical devices and optimizing the initial empirical antibiotic therapy could significantly reduce the incidence of these infections. Patients with A. baumannii infection and septic shock have a poor prognosis. A local antibiogram database is needed to better monitor the evolution of bacterial resistance in our hospital.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material 1

Funding information

The author(s) received no specific grant from any funding agency.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the technicians of the Bacteriology Laboratory of the Mohammed V Military Hospital in Rabat for their contribution to this study.

Author contributions

All authors have made substantial contributions. M.E. conceived, determined and designed the study. E.B. and M.E. acquired clinical and biological data. E.B. and M.B. analysed the data. E.B., M.B. and A.M. presented and interpreted graphical data. E.B. and M.B. drafted, corrected and edited the manuscript. A.M. and M.E. performed the linguistic review and critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical statement

Requests for authorization to conduct the study and for collaboration in the research were addressed to the hospital director and the chief of the diagnostic center. As this was a retrospective study, in which the investigator had no contact with the patients, informed consent was not required. However, anonymity and confidentiality were respected for all study data.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: ATCC, American Type Culture Collection; CI, confidence interval; COL, Colistin; EUCAST, European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range; OR, odds ratio; SD, standard deviation; XDR, extreme drug resistant.

One supplementary file is available with the online version of this article.

References

  • 1.Uwingabiye J, Frikh M, Lemnouer A, Bssaibis F, Belefquih B, et al. Acinetobacter infections prevalence and frequency of the antibiotics resistance: comparative study of intensive care units versus other hospital units. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;23:191. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.23.191.7915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Uwingabiye J, Lemnouer A, Roca I, Alouane T, Frikh M, et al. Clonal diversity and detection of carbapenem resistance encoding genes among multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates recovered from patients and environment in two intensive care units in a Moroccan hospital. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6:99. doi: 10.1186/s13756-017-0262-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lanjri S, Uwingabiye J, Frikh M, Abdellatifi L, Kasouati J, et al. In vitro evaluation of the susceptibility of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates to antiseptics and disinfectants: comparison between clinical and environmental isolates. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6:36. doi: 10.1186/s13756-017-0195-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lin MF, Lan CY. Antimicrobial resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: from bench to bedside. World J Clin Cases. 2014;2:787–814. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i12.787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Elouennass M, Bajou T, Lemnouer AH, Foissaud V, Hervé V, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii: étude de la sensibilité des souches isolées à l’hôpital militaire d’instruction Mohammed V, Rabat, Maroc. Med Mal Infect. 2003;33:361–364. doi: 10.1016/S0399-077X(03)00205-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Benaissa E, Abassour T, Belouad E, Maleb A, Elouennass M. Characterization of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates in a Moroccan hospital. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2022 doi: 10.1556/030.2022.01748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Punpanich W, Nithitamsakun N, Treeratweeraphong V, Suntarattiwong P. Risk factors for carbapenem non-susceptibility and mortality in Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia in children. Int J Infect Dis. 2012;16:e811–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Özgür ES, Horasan ES, Karaca K, Ersöz G, Naycı Atış S, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia due to extensive drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes. Am J Infect Control. 2014;42:206–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Townsend J, Park AN, Gander R, Orr K, Arocha D, et al. Acinetobacter infections and outcomes at an academic medical center: a disease of long-term care. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015;2:ofv023. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu Q, Li W, Du X, Li W, Zhong T, et al. Risk and prognostic factors for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex bacteremia: a retrospective study in a tertiary hospital of West China. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ñamendys-Silva SA, Correa-García P, García-Guillén FJ, González-Herrera MO, Pérez-Alonso A, et al. Outcomes of critically ill cancer patients with Acinetobacter baumannii infection. World J Crit Care Med. 2015;4:258–264. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v4.i3.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cisneros JM, Rodríguez-Baño J, Fernández-Cuenca F, Ribera A, Vila J, et al. Risk-factors for the acquisition of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Spain: a nationwide study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11:874–879. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chopra T, Marchaim D, Johnson PC, Awali RA, Doshi H, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for patients with bloodstream infection due to Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:4630–4635. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02441-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ardoino I, Zangirolami F, Iemmi D, Lanzoni M, Cargnelutti M, et al. Risk factors and epidemiology of Acinetobacter baumannii infections in a university hospital in Northern Italy: a case-control study. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44:1600–1605. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Turkoglu M, Mirza E, Tunçcan ÖG, Erdem GU, Dizbay M, et al. Acinetobacter baumannii infection in patients with hematologic malignancies in intensive care unit: risk factors and impact on mortality. J Crit Care. 2011;26:460–467. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.García-Garmendia JL, Ortiz-Leyba C, Garnacho-Montero J, Jiménez-Jiménez FJ, Pérez-Paredes C, et al. Risk factors for Acinetobacter baumannii nosocomial bacteremia in critically ill patients: a cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:939–946. doi: 10.1086/322584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Manchanda V, Sanchaita S, Singh N. Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter. J Glob Infect Dis. 2010;2:291–304. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.68538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ang H, Sun X. Risk factors for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infection in intensive care units: a meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Pract. 2018;24:e12644. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fang C, Chen X, Zhou M. Epidemiology and cytokine levels among children with nosocomial multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex in a tertiary hospital of Eastern China. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0161690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Michalopoulos A, Falagas ME, Karatza DC, Alexandropoulou P, Papadakis E, et al. Epidemiologic, clinical characteristics, and risk factors for adverse outcome in multiresistant gram-negative primary bacteremia of critically ill patients. Am J Infect Control. 2011;39:396–400. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ang H, Sun X. Risk factors for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infection in intensive care units: a meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Pract. 2018;24:29575345. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Osthoff M, McGuinness SL, Wagen AZ, Eisen DP. Urinary tract infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria: identification of risk factors and outcome predictors in an Australian tertiary referral hospital. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;34:79–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2015.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, et al. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:309–317. doi: 10.1086/421946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nutman A, Glick R, Temkin E, Hoshen M, Edgar R, et al. A case-control study to identify predictors of 14-day mortality following carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteraemia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:1028–1034. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gu Z, Han Y, Meng T, Zhao S, Zhao X, et al. Risk factors and clinical outcomes for patients with Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e2943. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Du B, Long Y, Liu H, Chen D, Liu D, et al. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection: risk factors and clinical outcome. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1718–1723. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1521-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lautenbach E, Patel JB, Bilker WB, Edelstein PH, Fishman NO. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: risk factors for infection and impact of resistance on outcomes. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:1162–1171. doi: 10.1086/319757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rodríguez-Baño J, Navarro MD, Romero L, Muniain MA, Cueto M de, et al. Risk-factors for emerging bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli . Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14:180–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01884.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Baran G, Erbay A, Bodur H, Ongürü P, Akinci E, et al. Risk factors for nosocomial imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Int J Infect Dis. 2008;12:16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2007.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Anunnatsiri S, Tonsawan P. Risk factors and clinical outcomes of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia at a university hospital in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2011;42:693–703. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kang C-I, Kim S-H, Park WB, Lee K-D, Kim H-B, et al. Bloodstream infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: risk factors for mortality and treatment outcome, with special emphasis on antimicrobial therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:4574–4581. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4574-4581.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Menashe G, Borer A, Yagupsky P, Peled N, Gilad J, et al. Clinical significance and impact on mortality of extended-spectrum beta lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates in nosocomial bacteremia. Scand J Infect Dis. 2001;33:188–193. doi: 10.1080/00365540151060806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bellíssimo-Rodrigues F, Gomes ACF, Passos ADC, Achcar JA, Perdoná G da SC, et al. Clinical outcome and risk factors related to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella spp. infection among hospitalized patients. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2006;101:415–421. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762006000400012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Furtado GHC, Bergamasco MD, Menezes FG, Marques D, Silva A, et al. Imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection at a medical-surgical intensive care unit: risk factors and mortality. J Crit Care. 2009;24:625. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kaya O, Akcam FZ, Gonen I, Unal O, Ceylan T. Risk factors for bacteremia due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in a Turkish hospital. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013;7:507–512. doi: 10.3855/jidc.2788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zavascki AP, Barth AL, Goldani LZ. Nosocomial bloodstream infections due to metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa . J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61:1183–1185. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.del Mar Tomas M, Cartelle M, Pertega S, Beceiro A, Llinares P, et al. Hospital outbreak caused by a carbapenem-resistant strain of Acinetobacter baumannii: patient prognosis and risk-factors for colonisation and infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11:540–546. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01184.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

Articles from Access Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES