Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 24;10:1198988. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1198988

Table 2.

Meta-analyses of serum lipid levels and disease activity.

Endpoints No. studies Pooled proportion using random-effects model Heterogeneity
WMD P I 2 P
Active IBD versus inactive IBD
TC level 5 −0.454, 95%CI = −0.722 to −0.187 0.001 0% 0.421
HDL-c level 4 −0.248, 95%CI = −0.542 to 0.047 0.099 87.6% <0.001
LDL-c level 4 −0.225, 95%CI = −0.445 to −0.005 0.045 0% 0.740
TG level 4 −0.129, 95%CI = −0.273 to 0.015 0.080 0% 0.868
Active CD versus active UC
TC level 2 −0.311, 95%CI = −0.648 to 0.026 0.071 0% 0.435
HDL-c level 2 -0.075, 95%CI = −0.196 to 0.046 0.226 0% 0.891
LDL-c level 2 −0.393, 95%CI = −0.666 to −0.121 0.005 0.7% 0.316
TG level 2 0.077, 95%CI = −0.148 to 0.302 0.502 26.3% 0.244
Inactive CD versus inactive UC
TC level 2 −0.629, 95%CI = −0.966 to −0.291 <0.0001 0% 0.683
HDL-c level 2 −0.059, 95%CI = −0.176 to 0.058 0.324 0% 0.378
Mild active UC versus non-mild UC
TC level 2 0.462, 95%CI = 0.176 to 0.748 0.002 0% 0.504
LDL-c level 2 0.346, 95%CI = 0.084 to 0.609 0.010 0% 0.647

WMD, Weighted mean difference; CI, Confidence Interval; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; CD, Crohn’s disease; UC, ulcerative colitis; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-c, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.

The p-value was statistically significant.