. 2023 Aug 24;25:e45836. doi: 10.2196/45836

Table 3.

Effects of the intervention on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV analyzed by generalized estimating equations.

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV outcomes		Group by time interaction effect				Change in baseline intervention group versus control group
		β^a (95% CI)		P value		β (95% CI)		P value
Total sample population^b
	Total	–2.039 (–3.928 to –.151)	.03		–2.039 (–3.928 to –.151)		.03
	Inattention	–.868 (–2.148 to .412)	.18		–.770 (–2.048 to .508)		.24
	Hyperactivity-impulsivity	–1.131 (–2.189 to –.074)	.04		–1.269 (–2.341 to –.197)		.02
Boys^c
	Total	–2.222 (–4.344 to –.101)	.04		–2.222 (–4.344 to –.101)		.04
	Inattention	–.990 (–2.467 to .488)	.19		–.889 (–2.366 to .589)		.24
	Hyperactivity-impulsivity	–1.185 (–2.357 to –.014)	.047		–1.333 (–2.519 to –.148)		.03
Girls^d
	Total	–.200 (–2.628 to 2.228)	.87		–.200 (–2.628 to 2.228)		.87
	Inattention	.400 (–.912 to 1.712)	.55		.400 (–.912 to 1.712)		.55
	Hyperactivity-impulsivity	–.600 (–2.386 to 1.186)	.51		–.600 (–2.386 to 1.186)		.51

^aCoefficient of generalized estimating equation model.

^b53 children with comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were included in the analysis.

^c45 boys with comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were included in the analysis.

^d8 girls with comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were included in the analysis.