Table 2.
Author | Black/AA participants (%) | Distinction between Black and AA? | Target population | Sexual orientation and/or gender identity | Part of HIV cascade | Theoretical foundations | Integration of culture | Method of delivery | Who facilitated the intervention? | Delivered in community setting? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSM and/or TGW (n = 10) | ||||||||||
Fernandez et al. [53] (2016) | 100 |
93% AA, 2% Black-Latino, 2% multiple Black identities, 3% other |
MSMW (18 +) |
84% bisexual, 7% gay/homosexual, 6% unsure/questioning/other, 3% straight/heterosexual |
Prevention | Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model | Negative stigma toward and discrimination against bisexuality; harmful stereotypes and media depiction of Black/AA men | Digital, real-time chat with facilitators | Not all ethnically matched; all had experience working with ethnic minority MSM | No, but developed in partnership with community advisory board |
Arnold et al. [54–56] (2019) | 100 | No | MSMW (18 +) | Identifying as not gay/homosexual or bisexual | Prevention | Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model | Masculinity and gender norms; secrecy and compartmentalization of sex with other men, desire not to be seen as gay; internalized, family, and church homophobia; discreet, one-on-one, non-judgmental intervention delivery; “men’s health” framing rather than “HIV prevention” | In-person | AA men | No, but developed via community-based participatory research |
Hightow-Weidman et al. [57] (2019) | 100 | No | YMSM (18–30) |
67% gay, 20% bisexual, 13% other |
Prevention | Integrated Behavioral Model | Duality of being gay and Black; racism, homophobia, cultural/familial beliefs on masculinity; social isolation and rejection from Black community and church due to gay identity and/or HIV status; ball culture | Digital | N/A | No, but developed via formative research with community |
Williams et al. [58] (2013) | 100 | No | MSMW living with HIV and history of childhood sexual abuse (18 +) | Identifying as not gay | Prevention | Social Cognitive Theory; Ecological Model | Triple minority identity (ethnic, sexual, living with HIV); the meaning of being an AA man; early socialization on gender and culture; adult experiences of being bisexual vs heterosexual within AA community; HIV stigma; recognizing stressors; learned strategies to cope with and regulate trauma | In-person | Ethnically matched men | No |
Harawa et al. [59] (2013) | 100 | No | MSMW (18 +) |
60% bisexual, 14% heterosexual, 12% gay/homosexual, 7% on the down low, 2% SGL, 5% none of the above/other |
Prevention | Theory of Reasoned Action; Theory of Planned Behavior; Empowerment Theory; Critical Thinking and Cultural Affirmation Model | AA culture (e.g., collectivism, spirituality); historical events (e.g., slavery, Tuskegee, Million Man March); Ghanaian Adinkra symbols; racism; lack of identification with gay labels; gender expectations; importance of keeping sex with other men discreet | In-person | Ethnically matched men | Yes, and developed in partnership with community agencies and advisory board |
Harawa et al. [60] (2020) | 100 | No | MSM (18 +) | 64% homosexual, gay, or SGL | Prevention | Dynamic Social Impact Theory; Social Comparison Theory; Social Cognitive Theory | Intersectionality of HIV-related stigma, homophobia within Black community, and racism from the White community | In-person | Peer mentors (participants able to choose mentors) | No, but developed via formative research with community and in partnership with community advisory board |
Harawa et al. [61] (2018) | 100 | No | Recently incarcerated MSMW (18 +) |
71% bisexual, 17% gay/homosexual/SGL, 7% heterosexual, 5% other/none of the above |
Prevention | Theory of Reasoned Action; Theory of Planned Behavior; Empowerment Theory; Critical Thinking and Cultural Affirmation Model | Adapted from MAALES (above, Harawa et al. (2013)); HIV risks and harm-reduction options in prisons and jails; challenges faced with reentry; HIV testing and stigma in custody settings | In-person | AA men | No, but developed with input from community advisory board |
Jemmott et al. [62] (2015) | 100 | No | MSM (18 +) |
41% bisexual 41% gay, 10% on the down low, 8% straight |
Prevention | Social Cognitive Theory; Theory of Reasoned Action; Theory of Planned Behavior; | Importance of keeping sex with other men discreet | In-person | Not gender, racially, or ethnically matched | No, but developed via formative research with community |
Herbst et al. [63–65] (2014) | 100 |
68% AA, 17% Caribbean/West Indian, 11% Afro-Latino, 3% mixed ancestry, 1% African |
MSM (18 +) |
78% gay/homosexual, 18% bisexual, 3% unsure, 1% straight/heterosexual |
Prevention | Social Cognitive Theory; Behavioral Skills Acquisition Model; Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change; Decisional Balance Model |
“Culture of Black MSM” session to help participants recognize how racism and homophobia are related to sexual and substance use risk behavior; duality of being Black and gay; relationships between STIs and HIV; familial, cultural, religious norms; sexual relationship dynamics common among Black MSM |
In-person | Peers |
Yes, and developed by CBOs serving Black MSM and a university-based HIV/STI prevention and training program via formative research with community |
Frye et al. [66–69] (2021) | 100 |
54% AA, 30% African/other, 7% Afro-Latino, 9% Caribbean |
YMSM, YTGW (18–29) |
60% gay/SGL/queer, 30% bisexual, 8% straight/heterosexual/other, 2% questioning/unsure |
Prevention (Testing) | Socio-ecological Model; Empowerment Theory; Self-efficacy Theory; Social Support Theory; Motivational Interviewing Theory | Intervention labeled “culturally-congruent,” but culture not defined | In-person | Peers | No, but developed via formative research with community |
Youth (n = 7) | ||||||||||
Klein et al. [70, 71] (2011) | 100 | No | Female youth (14–18) | Sample characteristics not described; intervention designed for heterosexual youth | Prevention | Social Cognitive Theory; Theory of Gender and Power | Adapted from SISTA [72], WiLLOW [73], and SIHLE [74]; culture defined as that of “young AA females”; cultivating gender and cultural pride through readings of poetry by AA women, AA art, learning about strong AA female role models; tailored language; games; AA teenage girls to perform as “Sistas” in video clips | Digital | N/A | No, but developed alongside team of young AA girls |
DiClemente et al. [75] (2014) | 100 | No | Female youth (14–20) | Sample characteristics not described | Prevention | N/A | Intervention labeled “culturally appropriate,” but culture not defined | Digital | Phone counseling delivered by AA female health educators | No |
Hadley et al. [76] (2016) | 100 |
24% with an additional racial identity 5% with Hispanic/Latino ethnic identity |
Youth (13–18) and caregivers | Sample characteristics not described | Prevention | Social Learning Theory | Adapted from STYLE [77]; DVD as a culturally sensitive technology for families; content tailored to youth; all featured actors were 16–18 (“near-peers”); different DVDs for youth and caregivers (e.g., hip-hop music for youth, parenting guidance for caregivers); developed with minority-owned health communications company specializing in culturally relevant products for urban and ethnic audiences | Digital | N/A | No |
Jemmott et al. [78] (2020) | 90 | No | Youth (11–14) and caregivers | Sample characteristics not described | Prevention | Social Cognitive Theory; Theory of Planned Behavior | Video content labeled as “culturally appropriate,” but culture not defined | Hybrida | AA adults | Yes, and developed with input from community advisory board |
Sznitman et al. [49, 79, 80] (2011) | 100 | No | Urban youth (14–17) | Sample characteristics not described | Prevention | Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication; Social Cognitive Theory | Broadly defined culture as “values, beliefs, norms, and behaviors shared by a group”; in-depth discussion of culture; acknowledgement of culture as dynamic and non-uniform; recognition of “skilled, expressive, and persuasive speech” as valued part of AA oral culture and dramatic formats as more persuasive than lecturing; Afrocentric vernacular; using ideas of Black masculinity that center on mutual respect and respectability rather than “sex as a conquest”; social pressures against delaying sex and using condoms | Digital (i.e., radio, TV) | Messages written by advertising professionals experienced in reaching AA youth | No, but developed via formative research with community and in partnership with community advisory board |
Donenberg et al. [81] (2020) | 100 | No | Female youth (14–18) and their female caregivers | Sample characteristics not described | Prevention | Social-Personal Framework; Social Learning Theory*; Social Cognitive Theory*; Theory of Gender and Power | Adapted from SISTA [72], SIHLE [74], and STYLE [77]; “labor and power gender divisions”; gender-specific standards for which sexual behaviors are appropriate in heterosexual relationships; ethnic and gender empowerment | In-person | Black/AA women experienced at working with youth in health settings | No, but developed with input from community advisory board |
DiClemente et al. [82, 83] (2014) | 100 | No | Female youth in juvenile justice system (13–17) | Sample characteristics not described | Prevention | ADAPT-ITT Model [84]; Social Cognitive Theory; Theory of Gender and Power | Adapted from HORIZONS [85]; intervention labeled as “culturally appropriate,” but culture not defined; ethnic and gender empowerment | In-person | AA female health educators | No, but developed with input from teen and community advisory boards |
Women (n = 5) | ||||||||||
Billings et al. [86] (2015) | 100 | No | High-risk women (18–50) | Sample characteristics not described | Prevention | Empowerment Theory | Message of intervention reinforced via unscripted videos of AA women describing importance of self-confidence and pride in being a Black/AA woman; intersectionality as a Black woman; framing condom use as a goal for women (rather than a behavior for men) | Digital | Black/AA women | No |
Gilbert et al. [87] (2021) | 100 | No, but 23% identified as Latinx | Women with drug history in CSPs (18 +) |
66% heterosexual, 31% bisexual, 3% other |
Prevention | Empowerment Theory; Social Cognitive Theory | Raises awareness of structural racism rooted in slavery and historical responses of resilience among Black/AA women; “explicit focus on structural racism along with its novel hybrid group format led by Black female CSP staff and a computerized individualized tool with Black women characters promoted effective cultural tailoring of content”; Afrocentric themes of historical trauma and resiliency | Hybrid | Black/AA women (counselors or case managers at CSPs) | Yes, and developed via community-based participatory research |
Wingood et al. [88] (2013) | 100 | No | Women (18–29) | Sample characteristics not described | Prevention | Social Cognitive Theory; Theory of Gender and Power | “Valuing one’s body, perceiving one’s body as a temple” described as “culturally appropriate connotation” | In-person |
Black/AA female health educators |
No |
Painter et al. [89] (2014) | 100 | No | Heterosexual women (18 +) | Sample characteristics not described | Prevention (Testing) | Health Belief Model; Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change; Social Cognitive Theory | Shared cultural aspects of Black/AA women’s experiences that shape vulnerability to HIV (e.g., intersectionality of being a Black woman in the South); Black/AA women’s collective wisdom and lived experiences | In-person | Black/AA women | Yes, developed out of a CBO |
DiClemente et al. [90] (2021) | 100 | No | Women (18–24) | Sample characteristics not described | Prevention | Social Cognitive Theory | Emphasizing gender and ethnic pride | Hybrid | Black/AA female health educators | Yes, and developed with input from community advisory board |
Others (n = 3) | ||||||||||
Bogart et al. [91] (2017) | 100 | No, but 6.5% identified as Latino | Adults living with HIV (18 +) |
36.3% straight, 42.8% gay man, 1.9% lesbian, 13.5% bisexual man, 1.4% bisexual woman, 1.4% not sure, 2.8% other |
Retention in/ Adherence to care/Linkage to treatment | Social-Ecological Theory; Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model | Survival mechanisms historically used by Black/AA people to cope with oppression: (1) adaptive duality (2) collectivism, (3) indirect communication, and (4) mistrust of outsiders; defined “culturally congruent” as customized to fit values, beliefs, traditions, and practices; gives examples of cultural and social determinants of health behavior of AAs as medical mistrust, HIV misconceptions, and experiences with discrimination; recognizes cultural issues associated with treatment nonadherence (e.g., medical mistrust, discrimination, internalized stigma) | In-person | Black/AA peer counselors | Yes, developed with community advisory board and CBO |
Stewart et al. [92] (2017) | 100 | No | Rural cocaine users (18 +) | Sample characteristics not described | Prevention | Social Cognitive Theory; Transtheoretical Model of Change | Culturally adaptation included revising intervention scripts to reflect rural drug setting, same-gender group sessions, restricting attendance to participants only, and hosting follow-ups in study offices rather than on the street; hygiene, condoms, and domestic violence identified as topics unique to community; engaging “book smarts and street smarts” by using both scientific and street terms and professional and lay facilitators | In-person | Black/AA health educator and peer leader | Yes, and developed via community-based participatory research |
Yancey et al. [93] (2012) | 100 | No | Heterosexual men and women (18–44) | Sample characteristics not described | Prevention | NTU (Africentric) conceptual framework; Theory of Gender and Power; Nguzo Saba | Inspired by African cultural principles of Umoja-unity, Kujichagulia-self-determination, Ujima-collective work and responsibility, Ujama-cooperative economics, Niapurpose, Kuumba-creativity, and Imanifaith; entire session dedicated to intersection of culture- and gender-related issues; gender and culture stressed throughout the intervention | In-person | Co-ed facilitator teams | Yes, and developed via community-based participatory research |
Abbreviations: AA African American, MSM men who have sex with men, TGW Transgender women, MSMW men who have sex with men and women, YMSM young men who have sex with men, YTGW young transgender women, SGL same gender loving, STI sexually transmitted infection, CBO community-based organization, CSP community supervision program
a“Hybrid” delivery method refers to a combination of in-person and digital components