Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 13;47:106–135. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.03

Table 4.

Conidial measurements of Botryosphaeriaceae species.

Species1 Conidia
Paraphyses
Reference
Conidial size (μm) (L × W)2 Mean (μm) (L × W)3 L/W4 long (μm)5 wide (μm)6
Do. citrimurcotticola (21.5–)23–25.5(–27)× (8.5–)9.5–11(–14) 24.4×10.3 2.4 This study
Do. striata (21–)23–26(–29.4) × (8.9–)9–12(–15.1) 25.1 × 10.7 2.4 Abdollahzadeh et al. (2014)
Do. uruguayensis (17–)22–22.5(–26.5) × (7–)9–9.5(–12) 22 × 9.25 2.4 Pérez et al. (2010)
Lasiodiplodia acaciae (21.5–)25–29.5(–31) × (11–)12–14(–15) 27.3 × 12.9 2.1 69 2–5 Zhang et al. (2021)
L. aquilariae (23–)25–28(–29) × 12–16 26.9 × 14.1 1.8 100 3 Wang et al. (2019)
L. cinnamomi (17.5–)18.7–21.1(–22.4) × (11.5–)12.7–14.1(–15.5) 19.9 × 13.4 1.5 106 3–4 Jiang et al. (2018)
L. citricola (20–)22–27(–31) × (10.9–)12–17(–19) 24.5 × 15.4 1.6 125 3–4 Abdollahzadeh et al. (2010)
L. guilinensis (23–)28–31(–33.5)× (13.5–)15–16.5(–17) 29.6 ×15.7 1.9 75 2–5 This study
L. huangyanensis (21–)28–32.5(–34) × (13–)14–16(–17) 30.1× 15 2 82 3–4 This study
L. linhaiensis (24.5–)27–30(–32)× (12.5–)13.5–15(–16) 28.5 × 14.2 2 80 2–6 This study
L. microconidia (18–)19–22(–23) × 10–15 20.8 × 13.2 1.5 90 3 Wang et al. (2019)
L. ponkanicola (16–)23.5–27.5(–28.5)× (11–)13–14.5(–15.5) 25.4 × 13.7 1.9 87 2–5 This study
Sphaeropsis citrigena (27–)28–33(–34) × (14.5–)15–18.5(–19) 30.5 × 16.8 1.8 25 3–5 Phillips et al. (2008)
S. linhaiensis (26.5–)28.5–35(–38)× (11.5–)14–18(–19.5) 31.6 × 15.9 2 27 1–5 This study

1 Isolates and measurements in bold were examined in this study.

2 Minimum – (average – standard deviation) – (average + standard deviation) – maximum or minimum – maximum, L × W = length × width.

3 L × W = average length × average width.

4 L/W = average length/average width.

5 Maximum.

6 Maximum or minimum – maximum.