Abstract
With the advancements in technology, medical educators are now able to create and deliver content to students through digital platforms. Electronic content (e-content) development has allowed educators to incorporate multimedia, animations, simulations, and interactive elements which support verbal instruction, such as improved expression and comprehension, into their teaching materials. E-content development is a relatively new field, but it is growing very rapidly. Recent findings have indicated that the e-learning sector will likely experience a huge surge in the upcoming years. The Indian government has launched various initiatives for e-content development in medical education. E-content development has great potential and can be used in various learning scenarios. While it initially gained popularity in higher education, it has since been applied to many other sectors, including healthcare. It allows educators to create highly engaging learning experiences that are accessible by all students. Challenges in e-content development include availability of the internet, creating content that is engaging and relevant to a wide range of learners, and access. Still, it is expected that the use of e-content in medical teaching will continue to increase in the future. The future of e-content development in medical teaching is likely to see continued growth and innovation as technology advances and more educators and learners recognize the benefits of online and digital resources.
Keywords: technology, deep learning, medical teaching, interactive elements, simulations, multimedia, digital content, e-learning, e-content development
Introduction and background
E-content development is creating digital content for online platforms, such as videos, animations, simulations, interactive quizzes, and interactive activities [1]. E-content is explicitly created for digital platforms and should not be repurposed for paper-based use [2]. The content can be delivered to students through online platforms such as digital interactive whiteboards (e-iWBs) and digital learning environments (DLEs) [3]. E-content development is a relatively new field, but it is proliferating, and findings have indicated that this sector is likely to experience a massive surge in the upcoming years [4,5]. E-Content Development has much potential and can be used in various learning scenarios [6], which are best used in flipped classrooms, blended learning, and virtual classrooms and can also be used to supplement existing instructional materials or create new ones [7].
The past ten years have seen significant progress in using e-learning materials for medical education [8,9]. The world has changed drastically due to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. New rules, technologies, and institutions are leading to further transformations. In contrast, digital technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), deep learning (DL), and machine learning (ML) are being used in the medical field, and specialized educational content is being released freely on platforms. With technological advancements, medical educators can create and deliver content to students through digital platforms [10,11]. This has enabled educators to provide students with more engaging, interactive, and insightful learning experiences. Electronic content (e-content) development has allowed educators to incorporate multimedia, animations, simulations, and interactive elements that support verbal instruction, such as improved expression and comprehension, into their teaching materials [12,13]. This has improved the learning experience and made it easier for students to comprehend complex topics. As a result, e-content development has become an integral part of medical teaching today [14-16]. E-content development has enabled medical educators to incorporate online quizzes and assessments into their teaching materials. This helps to assess students’ understanding of the material and provides feedback on their performance [17]. Furthermore, e-content development has enabled medical educators to create customized content for specific courses or subjects [18]. The beauty of e-content is that it breaks down barriers of time and place, enabling individuals to pursue learning independently [17,18]. For example, some courses, such as anatomy or physiology, may require more visual elements than others. E-content development allows for these visual elements to be incorporated into the teaching materials in an engaging and informative way [19]. Also, it enables medical educators to tailor their content according to the needs of their students [20,21].
Medical education is an essential part of ensuring the quality of healthcare [17]. It is the dynamic structural element of good education, and therefore, this article aims to explore how far we have come regarding e-content development and its role in medical teaching.
Review
Methods
To conduct a comprehensive literature search, we used the following databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We searched for articles published between 2013, and 2023, using the following search terms: ("e-content" OR "e-learning" OR "medical education" OR "medical teaching" OR "online learning" OR "digital education") AND ("curriculum" OR "content development" OR "instructional design" OR "courseware" OR "technology-enhanced learning"). We applied the following inclusion criteria for the final review: (1) original research articles, (2) English language, (3) peer-reviewed, (4) relevant to e-content in medical education, (5) full-text available, and (6) published in the specified time frame.
Articles Screened
After conducting the initial search, we identified a total of 2,558 articles across the searched databases. We then excluded duplicates (n=451) and conducted an initial screening of titles and abstracts, which excluded a further 1,943 articles. After the full-text screening of the remaining 164 articles, we excluded 146 articles for not meeting the inclusion criteria either they were not related to e-content or some were for patient care, leaving a total of 18 articles for the final review [22].
Duration and Number of Articles Included in Final Review
The literature search was conducted in February 2023. The final review included a total of 18 articles from the years 2013 to 2023 (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Prisma flow chart.
n - Number of Studies
Articles included in the review were, each of e-books, mixed reality, mobile e-content, online multiple-choice questions (MCQ), quizzes, and simulations. Two articles each were based on virtual teaching and web-based teaching. Three articles were on the e-learning platform and five were based on video-based e-learning (Table 1).
Table 1. Articles included in the study.
MCQ - Multiple Choice Question, HTML - Hypertext Markup Language
| Sr No | Authors | Year | E-content used or developed | Methods | Method of assessment | Findings |
| 1 | Tang F et al. [23] | 2017 | Video | One group watched a recorded lecture and video before the lecture and the other group was assigned traditional lecture-based teaching. | Pre- and post-tests | Promising results in ophthalmology by flipped classroom teaching |
| 2 | Ji M et al. [24] | 2022 | Video | Recorded video links to one group and traditional teaching to another group | Physiology final exam papers | Flipped classroom shows promising results in a physiology course |
| 3 | Baratz G et al. [25] | 2022 | Mixed reality | One group completed a mixed reality module and the cadaveric dissection and the other group only dissection | Quiz and survey and final examination | mixed reality improves long-term retention in breast anatomy |
| 4 | Glosser LD et al. [26] | 2022 | Video | Video before simulation and video in between simulation in two gropus | Assessed by a 44-point standardized checklist | The use of video instruction has been found to significantly improve students' clinical performance compared to relying solely on simulation-based learning. |
| 5 | Co M et al. [27] | 2021 | Video | Web-based surgical skill learning sessions and conventional face-to-face teaching in two groups | Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills Global rating scale | Surgical skills were comparable with online web-based teaching and face-to-face teaching |
| 6 | Lee LA et al. [28] | 2018 | Mobile e-content | Interactive multimedia versus Microsoft PowerPoint show | MCQ and multimedia situation tests | Mobile e-learning offers a flexible and interactive learning experience |
| 7 | Chang TP et al. [29] | 2014 | E-learning | Web-based, interactive, peer-reviewed Flash/HTML5 modules and traditional teaching | Post-rotation testing and in-training examination | Asynchronous E-learning is a promising modality |
| 8 | Gruner D et al. [30] | 2015 | E-learning | E-learning and articles (peer-reviewed) | Pre- and post-knowledge quiz and self-assessment | Improved global health knowledge scores |
| 9 | Davids MR et al. [31] | 2014 | E-learning | Comparison of two iterations of e-learning | Subjective, self-reported, and objective data | The design-test-redesign approach had significant improvements |
| 10 | Taveira-Gomes T et al. [32] | 2015 | Quiz | Study quiz and quiz groups | Recall accuracy is graded using a 4-point Likert scale | The study quiz task had a high impact on recall accuracy. |
| 11 | Dean WH et al. [33] | 2021 | Simulation | Simulation-based cataract surgical training and conventional training | Validated competency assessment rubric | Rapid acquisition of surgical competence |
| 12 | Yang C et al. [34] | 2020 | Web based | Flipped classroom web-based learning system for anatomy and traditional teaching | 5-point Likert scale questionnaire | The flipped classroom is an effective learning tool |
| 13 | Moazami F et al. [35] | 2014 | Virtual | Virtual and traditional learning | Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) and Essay Questions | More effective as compared to lecture-based training |
| 14 | Hsiao CC et al. [36] | 2016 | E-books | Interactive Multimedia eBooks and traditional PowerPoint | Pre-test and post-test | Interactive multimedia eBooks are more effective |
| 15 | Seifert LB et al. [37] | 2020 | Video | standardized teaching videos and traditional method | Structured checklists | Preferred method |
| 16 | Boscolo-Berto R et al. [38] | 2021 | Virtual | Virtual and traditional learning | Post-test | Significant improvement in the combination of virtual to traditional gross dissection |
| 17 | Mitra NK et al. [39] | 2015 | Online MCQ | Online and paper-based MCQ | Summative MCQ test scores | Computer-based formative tests with automated feedback led to improved performance. |
| 18 | Carpenter R et al. [40] | 2015 | Web-based | Web-based and a lecture-based cultural competency training | Likert-style multiple choice questions and short answer question | Cultural competencies are comparable |
In three studies [32,34,40], students were assessed using the Likert scale and observed that e-content is an effective learning tool. In three studies [28,35,39], the evaluation was performed on the basis of MCQs and observed better performance and a better learning experience in the students. In another study [26], a standardized 44-point scale was used, which significantly improved student clinical performance. Two studies [27,37] used structured checklists and observed e-content as a preferred method. In one study [24], video links showed promising results, and students were evaluated based on their final examination scores. In four studies [23,29,36,38], a post-test was conducted as an assessment tool and showed promising results. Two studies [25,30] conducted quizzes and observed improved students' knowledge. One study [31] applied subjective, self-reported, and objective data as a method of assessment and observed significant improvement. A validated competency assessment rubric was used in a study [33] to assess surgical competence, and observed that due to the e-content intervention, the acquisition of surgical competency is rapid.
How Far Have We Come?
The amount of research being conducted and the technologies being developed are increasing rapidly; moreover, the rise in popularity of e-learning has also fueled this growth [41]. With this in mind, the field of e-content development will continue to grow at a rapid pace. With the rise in the adoption of digital platforms for education and healthcare, the demand for engaging and accessible content is expected to increase [41-43]. This means we expect e-content development to remain essential to medical teaching. Furthermore, with the growth of virtual, augmented, and mixed-reality platforms, the way we experience and consume digital content is also evolving. Since these new technologies are still evolving and gaining popularity, it is difficult to say how they will shape the future of e-content development [14,44]. However, it is safe to assume that e-content will be a significant part of the content ecosystem.
The Indian government has launched various initiatives for e-content development in medical education, such as the National Medical College Network (NMCN) project, which aims to connect all medical colleges in India through a common digital infrastructure and facilitate the creation and sharing of e-content [45,46]. The government has also established the National Digital Library of India (NDLI), which provides access to a wide range of e-resources, including e-books, e-journals, and other educational materials related to medical science [47].
Another important initiative is the National Program on Technology Enhanced Learning (NPTEL), which is a joint project by the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) and the Indian Institute of Science (IIS). NPTEL provides online courses and e-learning materials for various disciplines, including medical science, and has collaborated with several medical colleges and institutions to create e-content for their programs [48].
In addition to the aforementioned initiatives, the Indian government has also launched the Swayam platform, which offers free online courses from various Indian universities and institutions, including medical education. Swayam courses are designed to provide high-quality education to students who may not have access to traditional classroom learning and offer a flexible learning experience that students can complete at their own pace [49]. The government has also established the e-Granthalaya program, a digital library management software enabling medical colleges to create and manage their digital libraries. The program provides access to a wide range of e-resources, including e-books, e-journals, and other digital materials related to medical science [50].
The Indian government has also launched the National Health Stack, a digital infrastructure that aims to improve the quality and accessibility of healthcare services in India. The National Health Stack includes various components, such as a Health Identity Document (ID) system, a National Digital Health Mission, and a National Health Analytics Platform, which are designed to facilitate the creation and sharing of health data and e-content related to medical education with an objective of to establish a system of electronic health records based on global standards, freely available to the public, healthcare professionals, and service providers, and based on the consent of the public. The National Health Stack's Health ID system provides a unique digital identity to every citizen in India, which can be used to access their health records and other medical information. This system will also help create a National Electronic Health Registry that can be used for research, policy-making, and improving healthcare services in India [51].
Furthermore, the National Digital Health Mission aims to create a digital infrastructure for healthcare services in India, including creating a digital health ecosystem and a health data exchange that can be used in developing e-content for medical education [52]. The National Health Analytics Platform will also provide access to health data for researchers and policymakers, enabling them to make informed decisions and improve healthcare services in India [53]. Overall, these initiatives are helping to create a robust digital foundation for medical education and healthcare services in India, which will play a significant role in improving the overall health and well-being of the population.
Types of e-content
Video
Video is the most common type of e-content that are typically self-paced and can be viewed through a computer, phone, or tablet. Through a video, students can learn about diverse topics such as medical ethics and diseases [54]. Video-based learning provides an avenue to tackle a lot of educational issues. With more and more people owning mobile phones and online education platforms available to share information, there are incredible possibilities to use video content for medical schooling [55].
Audio
Audio is typically used for learning facts and figures or for recapping events that were covered in a lecture [56]. Through an audio, students can listen to content and learn from a teacher. To make e-content more impressive, audio should be included in the recordings. There are several free software options available, such as Free Sound Recorder, Audacity, and WavePad. Some of them are open source and allows to record live audio with several features. Recordings can be edited by cutting, copying, and mixing with sound effects. Moreover, the speed or pitch of the recording can be altered, or even old recordings can be converted into digital formats [57].
Figures
The notion of multimedia learning in cognitive theory suggests that comprehension is much deeper when utilizing words and visuals together rather than just words on their own. Historically, verbal instruction has been the primary means of teaching, including verbal and written forms. Nowadays, there are many visual learning materials available, yet merely adding pictures to words may not necessarily lead to better learning [58].
Simulation
This is an interactive type of e-content that can be used for learning or for simulated training. Taking the initiative to incorporate simulation-based medical education is a vital part of curriculum development [59]. Simulation is an encompassing term for a simulated recreation of a real-world process created with the purpose of facilitating learning through hands-on experience. Simulation-based medical education is defined as any educational activity that utilizes simulation aids to replicate clinical scenarios. Simulations are playing a huge part in undergraduate, and postgraduate training, medical professional development, emergency planning, and military trauma response [60]. In addition to utilizing simulation for teaching and training, it can also be used for summative assessment [61].
Quiz
These quizzes are typically used for assessing student knowledge or for review. Through a quiz, students can answer questions and receive feedback on their performance. Using quizzes to augment medical education is one such approach. The quiz has historically been utilized as a feedback assessment tool, but more recently, it has made its way into the medical curriculum, mainly informally. Medical quizzes often follow one of two formats: case-based or image-based. This method aids in bridging the knowledge gap between standard classroom instruction and clinical application [62]. The quiz is a simple tool that enhances didactic lectures by helping students learn and understand more. Being an interactive tool centered on students, it promotes regular feedback mechanisms and encourages active student participation. Web-based quiz games can also be used to summarize the key content [63].
Virtual Reality
This type of e-content is becoming increasingly popular as technology advances. Through virtual reality, students can explore a new environment or experience a situation that would be difficult to do in person [64]. Virtual reality is emerging as a new technique for presenting simulation. Benefits of virtual reality for educators and students include on-demand, affordable, repeatable, and standardized clinical instruction [65]. It has been observed that simulation is better than traditional clinical education in several areas and produces potent educational interventions that have both immediate and long-lasting effects [66].
These are just some of the types of e-content that are available today. As technology continues to evolve, more types of e-content will become available for use in education and training [67]. As e-content development becomes more popular, advancements are also being made in this field. This means that educators can expect to see even more benefits and advantages of e-content development in the future [68].
Advantages of e-content development in medical teaching
E-content development has a lot of potential and can be used in a variety of learning scenarios. While it initially gained popularity in higher education, it has since been applied to many other sectors, including healthcare [17,69,70]. In medical teaching, the advantages of e-content development are numerous. For example, it allows educators to deliver content in a more efficient and cost-effective manner [8,17]. Additionally, e-content can be updated quickly and easily, allowing educators to keep up with the latest developments in the field [71]. Furthermore, online materials can be accessed by students from anywhere in the world, enabling them to learn at their own pace [72]. Finally, e-content development allows educators to use a variety of interactive elements such as videos, quizzes, and simulations that can help to engage students and increase their learning retention rates [17,41]. Schools, hospitals, and healthcare providers have found that e-content development has helped to improve the learning experience for students [1,10]. With the rise in the adoption of digital platforms for education and healthcare, the demand for engaging and accessible content is expected to increase [73].
Digital content allows educators to create highly engaging learning experiences by incorporating multimedia, simulations, and interactive elements into their e-content [74,75]. For example, videos can streamline complex topics and diseases by highlighting important features or topics of an event. Moreover, the ability to deliver content to students in multiple formats and platforms has also expanded the reach and accessibility of e-content [76]. This means that students can now access the content they need on their preferred devices, such as tablets and smartphones, at any time. Furthermore, e-content also allows educators to create content that is easily accessible to all students regardless of their learning styles [77]. This is possible thanks to the use of basic language and design elements. Additionally, digital content can be easily updated and revised to include the latest and the most up-to-date information and resources [78]. This helps ensure that students are receiving the most up-to-date information.
Overall, digital content provides numerous benefits for educators and students alike. It allows educators to create highly engaging learning experiences that are accessible by all students [79]. Finally, it provides a platform for educators to reach a wider audience with their e-content. In this way, digital content is an invaluable resource for both educators and students alike [80]. Some of the advantages of e-content are described below (Table 2).
Table 2. Advantages of e-content development in medical education.
| Advantage | Description |
| Flexibility and Convenience | E-content can be accessed anytime and anywhere, making it easier for medical students to learn at their own pace and on their own schedule [17]. |
| Interactive Learning | E-content allows for the integration of multimedia elements, such as videos, images, and simulations, that can enhance the learning experience and promote greater engagement [12]. |
| Cost-Effective | E-content development can be more cost-effective than traditional classroom-based instruction, as it eliminates the need for physical materials and resources [71]. |
| Personalized Learning | E-content can be tailored to meet the specific needs of individual students, allowing for personalized learning experiences that can improve learning outcomes [81]. |
| Improved Retention and Recall | The interactive and engaging nature of e-content can help students better retain and recall information, leading to improved learning outcomes [82]. |
| Continuous Improvement | E-content can be easily updated and revised, allowing medical educators to quickly adapt to new information and changes in the field [83]. |
| Collaboration and Communication | E-content development can facilitate collaboration and communication among medical students and educators, allowing for more efficient and effective knowledge-sharing [32]. |
| Accessibility and Inclusivity | E-content can be made accessible to a wider audience, including students with disabilities, and can be translated into multiple languages, making medical education more inclusive [84,85]. |
| Efficient Assessment | E-content can include built-in assessments and quizzes, allowing medical educators to quickly and efficiently evaluate student learning and identify areas for improvement [86]. |
| Sustainability | E-content is a more environmentally sustainable option than traditional classroom-based instruction, as it eliminates the need for physical materials and resources [87]. |
Challenges of e-content development in medical teaching
Medical education utilizes traditional teaching methods such as lectures, which can become ingrained in an organization's culture. This can lead to a reluctance to adopt new technologies [74]. As e-content development becomes more popular, it is also experiencing some challenges. For example, while virtual environments offer many benefits, they can also be expensive and difficult to implement [76]. Moreover, while some types of simulations can be quite effective, they can also be quite challenging to implement [88]. This means that while e-content development can be quite effective, it is important to understand the various challenges that it faces. Another challenge that many educators face when developing e-content is that it can be difficult for them to stay on track. This can be especially challenging for educators who are also responsible for teaching students face-to-face [89]. With the increasing use of high-tech devices for learning, it is important for educators to stay up-to-date with technology [41].
E-content is limited in that it cannot be used to assess student reactions face-to-face. However, video conferencing tools can help overcome this limitation [11]. Lastly, creating content that is engaging and relevant to a wide range of learners can be difficult [90]. This means that educators need to be creative in order to make sure their content is effective and useful for students. Limited access to technology, despite the increasing availability of technology, many parts are still lack access to reliable internet connectivity, computers, and other devices required for e-learning [91]. Some major disadvantages or limitations are described below (Table 3).
Table 3. Limitations in e-content development.
| Limitations | Description |
| Language barriers | In a diverse county like India with many different languages spoken, which can make it challenging to develop e-content that is accessible to all students [92]. |
| Quality control | The quality of e-content for medical education can be inconsistent, with some materials being of low quality or inaccurate [93,94]. |
| Cost | Developing high-quality e-content can be expensive, and many educational institutions in developing or in underdeveloped countries may not have the financial resources to invest in it [95,96]. |
| Lack of standardization | There is a lack of standardization in e-content development for medical education, which can lead to confusion among students and faculty [97]. |
| Limited interaction | E-content may not provide the same level of interaction as traditional classroom-based education, which can limit students' ability to ask questions and engage in discussions [75]. |
| Inadequate teacher training | Teachers may not be adequately trained to develop and use e-content, which can limit the effectiveness of online learning [89,98]. |
| Lack of motivation | Some students may lack the motivation to engage with e-content, which can reduce the effectiveness of the learning experience [99,100]. |
| Plagiarism and copyright issues | E-content development can be hindered by issues related to plagiarism and copyright infringement, which can lead to legal problems and damage the credibility of the educational institution [101]. |
Future of e-content development in medical teaching
It is obvious that a lot has been achieved in the domain of electronic content creation, however, there is still a lot more to do. This means that while the field has seen significant growth and progress in the past decade, it is also expected to continue evolving in the future [17]. With this in mind, it can be expected that e-content development to continue playing an important role in medical teaching [93]. In addition to the benefits that were discussed in this article, the use of e-content has also allowed educators to make use of more diverse technologies. As technology evolves and becomes more accessible, e-content will be used even more [67]. With this in mind, it is expected that the use of e-content in medical teaching will continue to increase in the future.
The future of e-content development in medical teaching is likely to see continued growth and innovation as technology advances and more educators and learners recognize the benefits of online and digital resources [102,103]. This may include the development of interactive and immersive educational experiences, such as virtual reality simulations and gamification, as well as the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning to personalize learning and provide real-time feedback [104]. However, it will also be important to ensure that these e-content developments are accessible, inclusive, and evidence-based and that they complement rather than replace traditional teaching methods [105].
Conclusions
Electronic content production is a relatively new discipline; however, its expansion is occurring extremely quickly. The e-learning sector is expanding, and e-content development has a lot of potential and can be used in various learning scenarios. It can be used for flipped classrooms, blended learning, and virtual classrooms. It can also be used to supplement existing instructional materials or to create new ones. E-content development has numerous benefits for medical educators and their students. The most important of these is the ability to deliver content to students in an engaging and easy-to-understand manner. Digital content allows educators to create highly engaging learning experiences by incorporating multimedia, simulations, and interactive elements into their e-content.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
- 1.E-learning in medical education in resource constrained low- and middle-income countries. Frehywot S, Vovides Y, Talib Z, et al. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning. Cook DA, Dupras DM. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:698–707. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30029.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.The effect of the interactive functions of whiteboards on elementary students’ learning. Luo YF, Yang SC. J Educ Comput Res. 2016;54:680–700. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: students’ perspective. Coman C, Țîru LG, Meseșan-Schmitz L, Stanciu C, Bularca MC. Sustainability. 2020;12:10367. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Almaiah MA, Al-Khasawneh A, Althunibat A. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) 2020;25:5261–5280. doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.AI technologies for education: recent research & future directions. Zhang K, Aslan AB. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2021;2:100025. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Blended Mode of Teaching and Learning: Concept Note. Blended mode of teaching and learning: concept note. 8/10/2022. [ Jan; 2023 ]. 2021. https://www.ugc.ac.in/searchresult.aspx?q=blended+mode+of+teaching&cx=000457167406620127635%3afugsadtztkk&cof=FORID%3a9 https://www.ugc.ac.in/searchresult.aspx?q=blended+mode+of+teaching&cx=000457167406620127635%3afugsadtztkk&cof=FORID%3a9
- 8.Development of e-learning in medical education: 10 years' experience of Korean medical schools. Kim KJ, Kim G. Korean J Med Educ. 2019;31:205–214. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2019.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: a meta-analytic approach. Shachar M, Neumann Y. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2003;4:1–20. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Using technology to meet the challenges of medical education. Guze PA. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530721/ Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015;126:260–270. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Innovative digital tools for new trends in teaching and assessment methods in medical and dental education. Park JC, Kwon HE, Chung CW. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:13. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: a systematic review. Abdulrahaman MD, Faruk N, Oloyede AA, et al. Heliyon. 2020;6:0. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.The use of elearning in medical education: a review of the current situation. Choules AP. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83:212–216. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.054189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Online learning: a panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. [ Feb; 2023 ];Dhawan S. J Educ Technol Syst. 2020 49:5–22. [Google Scholar]
- 15.The sudden transition to synchronized online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study exploring medical students' perspectives. Khalil R, Mansour AE, Fadda WA, et al. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:285. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02208-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Future of e-learning in medical education—perception, readiness, and challenges in a developing country. Syed S, Rastogi A, Bansal A, et al. Front Educ. 2021;6:1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 17.E-learning as new method of medical education. Masic I. Acta Inform Med. 2008;16:102–117. doi: 10.5455/aim.2008.16.102-117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Online teaching in medical training: establishing good online teaching practices from cumulative experience. Saiyad S, Virk A, Mahajan R, Singh T. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2020;10:149–155. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_358_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Marg BZ: GUIDELINES FOR E-CONTENT DEVELOPMENT. Guidelines for e-content developement. Univ GRANTS Comm. [ Jan; 2023 ]. 2007. https://www.ugc.ac.in/searchresult.aspx?q=e+content+development&cx=000457167406620127635%3afugsadtztkk&cof=FORID%3a9 https://www.ugc.ac.in/searchresult.aspx?q=e+content+development&cx=000457167406620127635%3afugsadtztkk&cof=FORID%3a9
- 20.Does tailoring instructional style to a medical student's self-perceived learning style improve performance when teaching intravenous catheter placement? A randomized controlled study. Papanagnou D, Serrano A, Barkley K, et al. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:205. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0720-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Medical education trends for future physicians in the era of advanced technology and artificial intelligence: an integrative review. Han ER, Yeo S, Kim MJ, Lee YH, Park KH, Roh H. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19:460. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1891-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. BMJ. 2021;372:0. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Comparison between flipped classroom and lecture-based classroom in ophthalmology clerkship. Tang F, Chen C, Zhu Y, et al. Med Educ Online. 2017;22:1395679. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1395679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Short and long-term influences of flipped classroom teaching in physiology course on medical students’ learning effectiveness. Ji M, Luo Z, Feng D, Xiang Y, Xu J. Front Public Health. 2022;10:835810. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.835810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Comparing learning retention in medical students using mixed-reality to supplement dissection: a preliminary study. Baratz G, Sridharan PS, Yong V, Tatsuoka C, Griswold MA, Wish-Baratz S. Int J Med Educ. 2022;13:107–114. doi: 10.5116/ijme.6250.0af8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Impact of educational instruction on medical student performance in simulation patient. Glosser LD, Lombardi CV, Hopper WA, et al. Int J Med Educ. 2022;13:158–170. doi: 10.5116/ijme.62a5.96bf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Online teaching of basic surgical skills to medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case-control study. Co M, Chung PH, Chu KM. Surg Today. 2021;51:1404–1409. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02229-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cognitive style and mobile e-learning in emergent otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery disorders for millennial undergraduate medical students: randomized controlled trial. Lee LA, Chao YP, Huang CG, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:0. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pediatric emergency medicine asynchronous e-learning: a multicenter randomized controlled Solomon four-group study. Chang TP, Pham PK, Sobolewski B, et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21:912–919. doi: 10.1111/acem.12434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Introducing global health into the undergraduate medical school curriculum using an e-learning program: a mixed method pilot study. Gruner D, Pottie K, Archibald D, et al. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:142. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0421-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Effect of improving the usability of an e-learning resource: a randomized trial. Davids MR, Chikte UM, Halperin ML. Adv Physiol Educ. 2014;38:155–160. doi: 10.1152/advan.00119.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.A novel collaborative e-learning platform for medical students - ALERT STUDENT. Taveira-Gomes T, Saffarzadeh A, Severo M, Guimarães MJ, Ferreira MA. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:143. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Intense simulation-based surgical education for manual small-incision cataract surgery: the ophthalmic learning and improvement initiative in cataract surgery randomized clinical trial in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Dean WH, Gichuhi S, Buchan JC, et al. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139:9–15. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.4718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Flipped classroom combined with human anatomy web-based learning system shows promising effects in anatomy education. Yang C, Yang X, Yang H, Fan Y. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a post-test only design study. Moazami F, Bahrampour E, Azar MR, Jahedi F, Moattari M. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Using interactive multimedia e-Books for learning blood cell morphology in pediatric hematology. Hsiao CC, Tiao MM, Chen CC. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:290. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0816-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Comparing video-based versions of Halsted's 'see one, do one' and Peyton's '4-step approach' for teaching surgical skills: a randomized controlled trial. Seifert LB, Schnurr B, Stefanescu MC, Sader R, Ruesseler M, Sterz J. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:194. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02105-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.The additional role of virtual to traditional dissection in teaching anatomy: a randomised controlled trial. Boscolo-Berto R, Tortorella C, Porzionato A, Stecco C, Picardi EE, Macchi V, De Caro R. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021;43:469–479. doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02551-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Effect of online formative assessment on summative performance in integrated musculoskeletal system module. Mitra NK, Barua A. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:29. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0318-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.A web-based cultural competency training for medical students: a randomized trial. Carpenter R, Estrada CA, Medrano M, Smith A, Massie FS Jr. Am J Med Sci. 2015;349:442–446. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Haleem A, Javaid M, Qadri MA, Suman R. Sustain Oper Comput. 2022;3:275–285. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Technology and the future of healthcare. Thimbleby H. J Public Health Res. 2013;2:0. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2013.e28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bohr A, Memarzadeh K. Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare. Copenhagen, Denmark: Academic Press; 2020. The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications; pp. 25–60. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. Mishra L, Gupta T, Shree A. Int J Educ Res Open. 2020;1:100012. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.National Telemedicine Portal. [ Jan; 2023 ];https://nmcn.in/ 2022 14:2023. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Telemedicine in India: where do we stand? Chellaiyan VG, Nirupama AY, Taneja N. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8:1872–1876. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_264_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.National Digital Library of India. [ Jan; 2023 ]. 2023. http://ndlproject.iitkgp.ac.in http://ndlproject.iitkgp.ac.in
- 48.NPTEL. [ Feb; 2023 ]. 2023. https://nptel.ac.in/ https://nptel.ac.in/
- 49. Swayam Central. [ Feb; 2023 ];https://swayam.gov.in/ 2022 14:2023. [Google Scholar]
- 50.e-Granthalaya e-Granthalaya. e-Granthalaya. [ Feb; 2023 ]. 2023. https://egranthalaya.nic.in/eg4.aspx https://egranthalaya.nic.in/eg4.aspx
- 51.Final Report - Lite Version.pdf. National Health Stack. [ Feb; 2023 ]. 2018. https://abdm.gov.in:8081/uploads/NHS_Strategy_and_Approach_1_89e2dd8f87.pdf https://abdm.gov.in:8081/uploads/NHS_Strategy_and_Approach_1_89e2dd8f87.pdf
- 52.National Digital Health Mission. [ Feb; 2023 ]. 2023. https://www.makeinindia.com/national-digital-health-mission https://www.makeinindia.com/national-digital-health-mission
- 53.National Data and Analytics Platform. National Data and Analytics Platform. February 16, 2023. [ Feb; 2023 ]. 2023. https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2020-01/Vision_Document_30_Jan.pdf https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2020-01/Vision_Document_30_Jan.pdf
- 54.Use of online clinical videos for clinical skills training for medical students: benefits and challenges. Jang HW, Kim KJ. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:56. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Use of video-based content in medical education. Duys R, Adam M, Spijkerman S. South Afr J Anaesth Analg. 2019;25:1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 56.E-learning in the field of medical education: journey from e-enhancement to online and moving towards hybrid mode. Anthonio AE, Mehndiratta M, Maroof KA, Kar R, Puri D. Indian J Med Biochem. 2021;25:118–120. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Audio use in e-learning: what, why, when, and how? Calandra B, Barron AE, Thompson-Sellers I. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/24297/ Int J E-Learn. 2008;7:589–601. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Designing an effective e-content development framework for the enhancement of learning programming. Hamtini T. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2016;11:131–141. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Simulation-based medical teaching and learning. Al-Elq AH. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3195067/ J Family Community Med. 2010;17:35–40. doi: 10.4103/1319-1683.68787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Simulation and its role in medical education. Datta R, Upadhyay K, Jaideep C. Med J Armed Forces India. 2012;68:167–172. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(12)60040-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Simulation in medical education. So HY, Chen PP, Wong GK, Chan TT. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2019;49:52–57. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2019.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.A review of the quiz, as a new dimension in medical education. Dengri C, Gill A, Chopra J, et al. Cureus. 2021;13:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Using a web-based quiz game as a tool to summarize essential content in medical school classes: retrospective comparative study. Yuenyongviwat V, Bvonpanttarananon J. JMIR Med Educ. 2021;7:0. doi: 10.2196/22992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Virtual reality and its applications in education: survey. Kamińska D, Sapiński T, Wiak S, et al. Information. 2019;10:318. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Virtual reality and the transformation of medical education. Pottle J. Future Healthc J. 2019;6:181–185. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2019-0036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. Med Educ. 2010;44:50–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.The evolution of e-learning and new trends. Bezhovski Z, Poorani S. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/IKM/article/view/29274 J Inf Knowl Manag. 2016;6:50–57. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Perspectives of e-content: a systematic review. Kaur D iInderpreet, Jyoti M, Ms.Raskirat Ms.Raskirat. http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/12187 Int J Adv Sci Technol. 2020;29:2698–2715. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Assessment of qualities of pandemic-driven e-content developed for higher education in India. Bhattacharya S, Tripathi K, Kumar A. Cogent Educ. 2023;10:2167315. [Google Scholar]
- 70.E-Contents | Government of India, Ministry of Education. [ Feb; 2023 ]. 2023. https://www.education.gov.in/en/e-contents https://www.education.gov.in/en/e-contents
- 71.E-content: a classroom anywhere - anytime. Pradipkumar CA. http://ijariie.com/FormDetailsCon.aspx?MenuScriptId=282 Int J Adv Res Innov Ideas Educ. 2017;2:185–189. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Access to education with online learning and open educational resources: can they close the gap? Geith C, Vignare K. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ837472 JALN. 2008;12:105–126. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Adoption of digital technologies in health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review of early scientific literature. Golinelli D, Boetto E, Carullo G, Nuzzolese AG, Landini MP, Fantini MP. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:0. doi: 10.2196/22280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education - an integrative review. O'Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J, Hannigan A, Last J, McGrath D. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:130. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Learner-content interaction in e-learning- the moderating role of perceived harm of COVID-19 in assessing the satisfaction of learners. Kumar P, Saxena C, Baber H. Smart Learn Environ. 2021;8:5. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Advantages and disadvantages of using e-learning in university education: analyzing students’ perspectives. Al Rawashdeh AZ, Mohammed EY, Al Arab AR, Alara M, Al-Rawashdeh B, Al-Rawashdeh B. Electron J E-Learn. 2021;19:107–117. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. El-Sabagh HA. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2021;18:53. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Impact of COVID-19 on digital medical education: compatibility of digital teaching and examinations with integrity and ethical principles. Egarter S, Mutschler A, Brass K. 2021;17:18. [Google Scholar]
- 79.Vanderbilt University: teaching outside the classroom. [ Feb; 2023 ]. 2022. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/teaching-outside-the-classroom/ https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/teaching-outside-the-classroom/
- 80.Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: hybrid and blended learning approach for covid-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world. Singh J, Steele K, Singh L. J Educ Technol Syst. 2021;50:140–171. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Duckett I. International Encyclopedia of Education. Vol. 3. New York, NY: Elsevier Science; 2010. Personalized learning and vocational education and training; pp. 391–396. [Google Scholar]
- 82.E-learning for health professionals. Vaona A, Banzi R, Kwag KH, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;1:0. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011736.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.The role of e-Learning in medical education. Huynh R. Acad Med. 2017;92:430. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Accessible e-learning and educational technology - extending learning opportunities for people with disabilities. Bühler C, Fisseler B. https://hal.science/hal-00257138/ Conference ICL2007. 2007;2007:1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 85.The use of multiple languages in a technology-based intervention study: a discussion paper. Im EO, Lee SJ, Hu Y, et al. Appl Nurs Res. 2017;38:147–152. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.The effects of different feedback types on learning with mobile quiz apps. Rüth M, Breuer J, Zimmermann D, Kaspar K. Front Psychol. 2021;12:665144. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.665144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Utilization e-learning as an effort to support eco-friendly learning. Putri D, Jayatri F. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2020;485:12118. [Google Scholar]
- 88.The scope and limits of simulation in automated reasoning. Davis E, Marcus G. Artif Intell. 2016;233:60–72. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Johnson AM, Jacovina ME, Russell DG, Soto CM. Adaptive Educational Technologies for Literacy Instruction. Vol. 1. New York, NY: Routledge; 2016. Challenges and solutions when using technologies in the classroom; p. 18. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Understanding difficulties and resulting confusion in learning: an integrative review. Lodge JM, Kennedy G, Lockyer L, Arguel A, Pachman M. Front Educ. 2018;3:49. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Aung T, Khaing S. Genetic and Evolutionary Computing. Vol. 388. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016. Challenges of Implementing e-learning in developing countries: a review; pp. 405–411. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Language and language-in-education planning in multilingual India: a minoritized language perspective. Groff C. Lang Policy. 2017;16:135–164. [Google Scholar]
- 93.The future of E-Learning in medical education: current trend and future opportunity. Kim S. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2006;3:3. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2006.3.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.The level of satisfaction and quality of E-learning in medical universities of Iran during the epidemic of COVID-19. Iravani M, Nasab MB, Bahmaei H, Ghanbari S, Mohaghegh Z, Siahkal SF. J Educ Health Promot. 2022;11:9. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1555_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Use of open educational resources in e-learning for higher education. Navarrete R, Luján-Mora S, Peñafiel M. ICEDEG. 2016:164–170. [Google Scholar]
- 96.E-content development: prospects and challenges. Joshi BD. http://ijariie.com/FormDetailsCon.aspx?MenuScriptId=280 Int J Adv Res Innov Ideas Educ. 2017;2:177–179. [Google Scholar]
- 97.Standardization in medical education: review, collection and selection of standards to address technical and educational aspects in outcome-based medical education. Vaitsis C, Spachos D, Karolyi M, Woodham L, Zary N, Bamidis P, Komenda M. https://mj.mefanet.cz/mj-20170523 Mefanet J. 2017;2017:28–39. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Faculty’s and students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19. Almahasees Z, Mohsen K, Amin MO. Front Educ. 2021;6:1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: a qualitative case study. Meşe E, Sevilen Ç. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jetol/issue/60134/817680 J Educ Technol Online Learn. 2021;4:11–22. [Google Scholar]
- 100.Supporting students’ motivation for e-learning: teachers matter on and offline. Fryer L, Bovee H. Internet High Educ. 2016;30:21–29. [Google Scholar]
- 101.The awareness of copyright towards digital content among library users. Ibrahim Khan H, Wan Mohd Saman WS, Sani M. https://ibima.org/accepted-paper/awareness-copyright-towards-digital-content-among-library-users/ IBIMA Conference. 2015;3881:95. [Google Scholar]
- 102.Technology-enhanced faculty development: future trends and possibilities for health sciences education. Yilmaz Y, Lal S, Tong XC, et al. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30:1787–1796. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01100-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.A systematic review of the factors - enablers and barriers - affecting e-learning in health sciences education. Regmi K, Jones L. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:91. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Gamification and virtual reality for digital twins learning and training: architecture and challenges. Bucchiarone A. Virtual Real Intell Hardw. 2022;4:471–486. [Google Scholar]
- 105.ICT in education: a critical literature review and its implications. Fu JS. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1182651 Int J Educ Dev. 2013;9:112–125. [Google Scholar]

