Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 24;28(17):6236. doi: 10.3390/molecules28176236

Table 6.

Structure-based alignment assessment of 5-HT2BR ligands.

Code AutoDock Vina SMINA DOCK PLANTS Ref.
SF a Vina Vinardo ad4 chemplp plp plp95
Randomized Conformation Cross-Docking (RCCD)
4NC3 b 4.454 c 2.785 2.986 2.784 2.984 4.313 3.125 2.742 3.421 [29]
4IB4 3.431 2.895 4.124 3.984 2.634 3.453 3.784 2.563 2.741 [29]
5TUD 3.625 2.748 2.642 3.614 3.569 3.695 2.539 2.597 3.625 [57]
5TVN 2.895 1.993 1.963 1.943 3.964 3.241 2.431 3.254 2.346 [31]
6DRX 2.674 2.864 2.424 2.435 2.874 3.254 2.964 3.541 2.758 [33]
6DRY 2.895 2.998 3.894 3.784 2.695 2.451 2.531 2.431 2.321 [33]
6DRZ 2.992 2.674 3.431 3.895 3.624 2.563 2.728 3.522 2.462 [33]
6DS0 2.567 1.864 2.974 2.983 2.874 2.451 2.351 2.214 3.325 [33]
7SQR 2.517 2.957 2.987 2.524 2.595 3.648 2.487 2.845 2.635 [32]
7SRS 2.698 1.997 1.987 1.987 2.749 2.874 2.228 2.457 3.984 [32]
7SRR 3.624 2.487 2.964 1.987 2.996 3.625 2.487 2.625 3.635 [32]
DA d 31.82% 63.64% 45.45% 45.45% 36.36% 18.18% 40.91% 36.36% 31.82%

a Scoring function; b Experimental conformation; c Root-Mean-Square-Deviation measured between the heavy atoms of the ligand’s experimental and the ligand’s re-/cross-aligned conformation; d Docking accuracy.