Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 4;12(17):5751. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175751

Table 5.

Comparison of patients with posterior rectopexy alone and with combined anterior repair.

Posterior Repair Alone (n = 179) Combined Repair (n = 90) p-Value
Age 62.6 ± 14.2 61.5 ± 10.8 0.47
Body mass index 23.5 ± 4.50 24 ± 4.20 0.43
ASA class ≥ III 7 (3.9) 1 (1.1) 0.27
Previous hysterectomy 60 (33.5) 26 (28.9) 0.48
Indication of rectopexy <0.001 *
External rectal prolapse 76 (42.5) 17 (18.9)
Rectocele 94 (52.5) 72 (80)
Other 9 (5) 1 (1.1)
Synthetic mesh 135 (75.4) 87 (96.6) <0.001 *
Length of stay 3.13 ± 1.48 3.29 ± 1.17 0.35
30 d postop complication 3 (1.6) 3 (3.3) 0.405
Postoperative symptoms 74 (41.3) 44 (48.8) 0.24
De novo symptoms 33 (18.4) 19 (21.1) 0.6
Recurrence 27 (15.1) 5 (5.6) 0.023 *
Reoperation 18 (10.1) 2 (2.2) 0.02 *

* indicates statistical significance.