Table 2.
General Dominance Weights for Youth-Reported Psychopathy Features and Externalizing Outcomes
| Callousness |
Uncaring |
Antagonism |
Disinhibition |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GD Weight | 95% CI | GD Weight | 95% CI | GD Weight | 95% CI | GD Weight | 95% CI | Total R 2 | |
| Externalizing Behavior (Baseline) | |||||||||
| Questionnaire | |||||||||
| Externalizing Behavior | .06a (17%) | .02; .15 | .05a (11%) | .01; .12 | .17a (39%) | .09; .28 | .17a (39%) | .09; .25 | .44 |
| EMA | |||||||||
| Since the last prompt… | |||||||||
| Yell/Argue | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | .01 (50%) | – | .01 (50%) | – | .02 |
| Break/damage property | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | .00 |
| When you were feeling your worst or most upset… | |||||||||
| Scream/Yell | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | .05 (63%) | – | .02 (25%) | – | .08 |
| Hit/Slam/Punch | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | .01 (14%) | – | .02 (29%) | – | .03 (43%) | – | .07 |
| Externalizing Behavior (Follow-up) | |||||||||
| Questionnaire | |||||||||
| Externalizing Behavior | .04a (25%) | .00; .11 | .03a (19%) | .00; .09 | .05a (31%) | .01; .14 | .05a (31%) | .01; .14 | .16 |
| EMA | |||||||||
| Since the last prompt… | |||||||||
| Yell/Argue | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | .01 (50%) | – | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | .02 |
| Break/damage property | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| When you were feeling your worst or most upset… | |||||||||
| Scream/Yell | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | .07 (78%) | – | .01 (11%) | – | .09 |
| Hit/Slam/Punch | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | .01 (50%) | – | < .005 (~ 0%) | – | .02 |
Percentages in parentheses represent the ratio of the general dominance weight to total R2. GD weights with mismatching superscripts indicate that the general dominance weights are significantly different from one another based on bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. Matching superscripts indicate no significant differences between weights. The sum of general dominance weights does not always equal R2 due to rounding error. Results for EMA-Break/damage property are not reported at baseline due to singular fit of the multilevel model. Patterns of general dominance were not affected when including demographic covariates (age, sex, minority status, receipt of public assistance)
Callousness = Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits-Callousness, Uncaring = Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits-Uncaring, Antagonism = PID-5-BF-Antagonism substituting hostility item for callousness item, Disinhibition = PID-5-BF-Disinhibition, Externalizing Behavior (Questionnaire) = Child Behavior Checklist Externalizing Behaviors scale, EMA = Ecological momentary assessment; GD = General dominance