Skip to main content
. 1998 Jun;36(6):1625–1629. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.6.1625-1629.1998

TABLE 1.

Yields obtained by HSCD versus PC DNA extractiona

Organism and CFU Mean ± SEM (μg/ml)
95% CI (μg/ml) (min, max)
Two-tailed P value
HSCD PC HSCD PC
Yeasts
C. albicans
  108 19.02 ± 1.94 3.03 ± 0.06 +14.54, +23.50 +2.88, +3.18 ≤0.005
  107 0.76 ± 0.08 0.70 ± 0.05 +0.57, +0.94 +0.58, +0.83 NS
T. beigelii
  108 6.07 ± 0.98 1.71 ± 0.15 +3.82, +8.33 +1.37, +2.05 ≤0.005
  107 0.22 ± 0.02 0.39 ± 0.04 +0.17, +0.27 +0.29, +0.49 ≤0.05
C. neoformans
  108 1.71 ± 0.43 2.32 ± 0.31 +0.72, +2.69 +1.62, +3.02 NS
  107 0.99 ± 0.23 0.47 ± 0.11 +0.46, +1.51 +0.22, +0.72 ≤0.05
Filamentous fungi
A. fumigatus
  108 29.94 ± 1.88 10.22 ± 1.42 +25.59, +34.28 +6.95, +13.49 ≤0.005
  107 2.59 ± 0.73 1.22 ± 0.26 +0.92, +4.27 +0.63, +1.81 ≤0.01
F. solani
  108 49.12 ± 5.50 0.90 ± 0.03 +36.43, +61.81 +0.82, +0.97 ≤0.005
  107 2.48 ± 0.22 QNS +1.96, +3.00 QNS
a

CI, confidence interval; NS, not significant; QNS, quantity not sufficient. n is 9 for both procedures, all organisms, and all CFU values.