Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 31;15(17):3808. doi: 10.3390/nu15173808

Table 3.

Regions of Interest (ROI) t-values for the four main hypothesized contrasts (see methods).

ROI
Coordinates (x, y, z)
ROI Label Baseline
BE > NB
Food > NF
Post
BE > NB
Food > NF
Post
NT > RYGB
BE > NB
HEF > LEF
Baseline > Post
NT > RYGB
HEF > LEF
−20, −64, 30 Precuneus 2.74 * 2.76 * 2.3 −1.71
32, 36, 6 Inferior Frontal Gyrus 0.38 2.17 3.09 * −1.14
−6, 2, 36 Dorsal Cingulate 2.0 1.98 2.0 −1.84
8, 58, 16 Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex 1.17 −0.18 1.27 −2.53 *a
20, 38, 22 Anterior Cingulate 2.26 1.46 2.13 −1.26
−14, −22, 4 Thalamus 0.81 3.89 ** 1.94 −1.81
34, −70, 6 Middle Occipital Gyrus 1.16 0.41 3.06 * −1.65
28, 22, 32 Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex 1.31 1.55 1.74 −1.49
−62, −12, 38 Precentral Gyrus 1.43 0.76 1.05 −1.86

* Significant at p < 0.006 uncorrected. ** Significant at p < 0.05 corrected. Baseline and 4 months post-surgery BMIs were entered as covariates. a From baseline to 4 months post-surgery, the RYGB and NT groups had reduced activation in this region in response to High (vs. Low Energy Density) Food, whereas RYGB had an increase and NT had a decrease in response to Low (vs. High Energy Density) Food.