TABLE 6.
Specificities of 14 brucellosis serologic tests in California field study goats
| Test | Specificity (%) (95% CI) | n |
|---|---|---|
| 8%Card | 100 (97.7, 100) | 200 |
| RAP | 100 (97.6, 100) | 199 |
| 8%RB | 100 (97.7, 100) | 200 |
| 3%RB | 99.5 (96.8, 100) | 200 |
| 4.5%RB | 100 (97.6, 100) | 197 |
| BAPA | 99.5 (96.8, 100) | 200 |
| CFA | 100 (97.5, 100) | 191 |
| CFM | 100 (97.5, 100) | 191 |
| ELISA | 100 (97.6, 100) | 197 |
| SATA 1:25 | 92 (83.8, 97.4) | 200 |
| SATA 1:50 | 99.5 (96.8, 100) | 200 |
| SATA 1:100 | 100 (97.7, 100) | 200 |
| SATM 1:25 | 73 (61.8, 82.0) | 200 |
| SATM 1:50 | 96 (91.7, 98.2) | 200 |
| SATM 1:100 | 98.5 (94.0, 99.8) | 200 |
| SATM 1:200 | 100 (97.7, 100) | 200 |
| SPT 1:25 | 92.5 (85.5, 96.4) | 200 |
| SPT 1:50 | 99 (96.1, 99.8) | 200 |
| SPT 1:100 | 100 (97.7, 100) | 200 |
| URIV 1:25 | 100 (97.6, 100) | 198 |
| MRIV 1:25 | 99.0 (96.6, 100) | 193 |
| MRIV 1:50 | 100 (97.6, 100) | 193 |