Table 8.
Comparison of the results between the RSQ Motion sensor placed on Propriometer (IMU1) and RSQ Motion sensor placed directly on the arm (IMU2) in the measurement of maximal range of motion of flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation. N = 180.
| IMU 1 [°] | IMU 2 [°] | Difference (IMU1-IMU2) [°] |
ICC (95% Cl) | LOA [°] | MDC95 (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLX | 161 ± 8 | 168 ± 6 | 7 ± 4 | 0.93 (0.91–0.94) | −14; 1 | 5.1 (3.1%) |
| ABD | 162 ± 8 | 167 ± 6 | 5 ± 4 | 0.91 (0.89–0.93) | −13; 3 | 5.8 (3.5%) |
| InR | 67 ± 10 | 59 ± 10 | 8 ± 2 | 0.99 (0.98–0.99) | 4; 13 | 2.8 (4.4%) |
| ExR | 88 ± 13 | 94 ± 12 | 6 ± 3 | 0.99 (0.98–0.99) | −12; −1 | 3.5 (3.8%) |
ICC—Intra-Class Correlation coefficient; 95% CI—95% Confidence Interval; LOA—Limits of Agreement; MDC95—Minimal Detectable Change with 95% confidence interval.