Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurol Sci. 2023 May 12;450:120687. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2023.120687

Table 1.

Patient demographics and clinical and radiologic findings. Unless otherwise specified, p values were calculated with Kruskal-Wallis test (quantitative variables) or Pearson’s Chi squared test (qualitative variables).

MOGAD
n = 63
AQP4+ NMOSD
n = 37
MS
n = 26
P-value MOGAD vs. MS
P-value
MOGAD vs. AQP4+NMOSD
P-value
Demographics/Clinical data
Sex, female (%) 30 (48) 32 (87) 20 (77) < 0.001 0.01 < 0.001
Median age at attack onset, years (range) 27 (4-74) 52 (17-77) 39 (19-59) < 0.001 0.01 < 0.001
Children, <18 years (%) 18 (29) 1 (3) 0 (0) <0.001 a 0.001 a 0.001 a
Ethnicity, Caucasian (%) 55 (87) 24 (65) 26 (100) < 0.001 0.06 0.008
Median EDSS at nadir (range) 6 (0-8)
n = 62
6 (2-8.5)
n = 33
2 (2-6)
n = 24
<0.001 <0.001 0.48
Radiologic findings
Marked central canal T2-hyperintensity 18/63 (29) 13/37 (35) 1/26 (4) 0.007 a 0.01 a 0.493
Median number of days from myelitis symptom onset to spinal cord MRI (range) 10 (1-24)
n =44
8 (1-28)
n = 25
17.5 (3-28)
n = 18
0.05 0.015 0.84
a

Fisher’s exact test.

n= denotes the denominator as some patients did not have sufficient documentation to provide all data