Skip to main content
editorial
. 2023 Aug 23;31(9):2554–2556. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.08.012

Table 1.

Comparison between main ex vivo and in vivo editing features

Criteria Ex vivo engineering In vivo engineering
Patient convenience may require cell collection from patient, waiting times no need for cell collection, timely availability
Preconditioning preconditioning regimen is recommended may bypass the need for preconditioning
Precision & control high precision in manufacturing, quality checks high percision in delivery vector design
Validation & efficiency clinically validated, high editing efficiency still under validation, varying efficiency
Manufacturing & logistics complex and lengthy process, logistical burden simplified process, minimal logistics
Cost & infrastructure high cost, complex infrastructure required generally reduced cost and infrastructure needs
Cell fitness considerations possibility of reduced cell fitness due to ex vivo culturing possibility of preserved cell fitness due to direct in vivo editing
Toxicity risks controlled ex vivo editing, potential risks of toxicity and off-target effects uncontrolled in vivo editing, increased risk of toxicity and off-target effects
Immunogenicity potential risks of immunogenic responses, method-dependent higher risk of immunogenicity