Table 1.
Comparison between main ex vivo and in vivo editing features
Criteria | Ex vivo engineering | In vivo engineering |
---|---|---|
Patient convenience | may require cell collection from patient, waiting times | no need for cell collection, timely availability |
Preconditioning | preconditioning regimen is recommended | may bypass the need for preconditioning |
Precision & control | high precision in manufacturing, quality checks | high percision in delivery vector design |
Validation & efficiency | clinically validated, high editing efficiency | still under validation, varying efficiency |
Manufacturing & logistics | complex and lengthy process, logistical burden | simplified process, minimal logistics |
Cost & infrastructure | high cost, complex infrastructure required | generally reduced cost and infrastructure needs |
Cell fitness considerations | possibility of reduced cell fitness due to ex vivo culturing | possibility of preserved cell fitness due to direct in vivo editing |
Toxicity risks | controlled ex vivo editing, potential risks of toxicity and off-target effects | uncontrolled in vivo editing, increased risk of toxicity and off-target effects |
Immunogenicity | potential risks of immunogenic responses, method-dependent | higher risk of immunogenicity |