. 2023 Jul 25;12:191. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_251_22

Table 2.

Information of studies included in the analysis step; mean age, sex, and treatment type

Row	First Author	Publication Year	Setting	Mean Age (Year±SD)			Total patients	Treatment Type	Men/Women	QA

				Treatment 1	Treatment 2	Treatment 3
1	Donk, R.D[9]	2017	USA	44.3±5.6	43.1±7.5	44.1±6.4	142	ACD¹	71/71	Excellent
								ACDF²
								ACDA³
2	Coric, D[25]	2011	---	43.7±7.76	43.9±7.39	---	269	Kineflx\|C	110/159	Excellent
2	Coric, D[25]	2011	---	43.7±7.76	43.9±7.39	---	269	ACDF	110/159	Excellent
3	Dunn, C[26]	2018	USA	49.9±9.8	49±11.5	---	259	ACDF	133/126	Excellent
3	Dunn, C[26]	2018	USA	49.9±9.8	49±11.5	---	259	MI-PCF⁴	133/126	Excellent
4	Gornet, M.F[27]	2016	USA	44.5±8.8	43.9±8.8	---	545	CDA⁵	251/294	good
4	Gornet, M.F[27]	2016	USA	44.5±8.8	43.9±8.8	---	545	ACDF	251/294	good
5	Radcliff, K[28]	2016	USA	45.3±8.1	46.2±7.9	---	330	Mobi-C⁶	158/172	Excellent
5	Radcliff, K[28]	2016	USA	45.3±8.1	46.2±7.9	---	330	ACDF	158/172	Excellent
6	Skeppholm, M[29]	2015	Sweden	46.7±6.7	47±6.9	---	151	ADR⁷	73/78	good
6	Skeppholm, M[29]	2015	Sweden	46.7±6.7	47±6.9	---	151	ACDF	73/78	good
7	Vleggeert- Lankamp, C. L. A[30]	2019	Netherlands	46.4±7.3	47.5±8	46.5±8.7	109	ACD	51/58	Excellent
								ACDF
								ACDA

Anterior Cervical Discectomy¹, Anterior Cervical Discectomy without Fusion², Anterior Cervical Discectomy Arthroplasty³, Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy⁴, Cervical Disc Arthroplasty⁵, 2-level cervical total disc replacement^6, Artificial Disc Replacement⁷