Table 5.
Annotation of the quality classification modified according to Shabazfar et al. [69]
| Scale | Criterion | Meaning of criterion | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Journal | “Peer review” | Increased result validity through peer review | Simple |
| Study design | Randomization | Random allocation of the subjects? | Double |
| Investigation of established hypotheses | Have hypotheses been made and answered? | Double | |
| Measurement tools | Suitable measuring instrument | Objectifiable measurements? | Simple |
| Patients | Objective comparison of two consumables | Possible comparison of subjects? | Simple |
| Number | Sufficient patient number? (> 35) | Simple | |
| Results | Adequate level of data aggregated | Have results been compiled appropriately? | Simple |
| Investigator | Number of investigators mentioned? How many? | Simple |