Table 5.
Annotation of the quality classification modified according to Shabazfar et al. [69]
Scale | Criterion | Meaning of criterion | Score |
---|---|---|---|
Journal | “Peer review” | Increased result validity through peer review | Simple |
Study design | Randomization | Random allocation of the subjects? | Double |
Investigation of established hypotheses | Have hypotheses been made and answered? | Double | |
Measurement tools | Suitable measuring instrument | Objectifiable measurements? | Simple |
Patients | Objective comparison of two consumables | Possible comparison of subjects? | Simple |
Number | Sufficient patient number? (> 35) | Simple | |
Results | Adequate level of data aggregated | Have results been compiled appropriately? | Simple |
Investigator | Number of investigators mentioned? How many? | Simple |