Table 4.
Overview of the characteristics of the included studies
Study | Setting | Materials | Evaluation criteria | No of patients | No of teeth | Type of restoration | Evaluated teeth. Restoration material | Cementation material | Follow-up (y) | Dropout (%) | Survival (%) | Type of failure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCT | ||||||||||||
Aslan et al. (2019) | University | LD. IC | Modified USPHS |
35 M: 12 W: 23 |
75 Pr: 15 Mo: 60 |
Inlay: 22 Onlay: 53 |
25 LD: IPS e.max CAD | DC. Variolink Esthetic | 1 mn | 0 | 100 | |
25 GC: lithium aluminosilicate | DC. Variolink Esthetic | 1 mn | 0 | 100 | ||||||||
25 IC: Cerasmart | DC. Variolink Esthetic | 1 mn | 0 | 100 | ||||||||
Coşkun et al. (2020) | University | LD. IC | Modified USPHS |
14 M: 8 F: 6 |
60 Pr: 10 Mo: 60 |
Inlay: 4 Onlay: 56 |
30 LD: IPS e.max CAD | DC. Variolink Esthetic | 2 mn | 0 | 100 | |
30 IC: Cerasmart | DC. Variolink Esthetic | 2 mn | 0 | 100 | ||||||||
Souza et al. (2021) | University | LD. IC | FDI |
20 M: 15 F: 5 |
Pr: 4 Mo: 16 |
Onlay: 40 | 20 LD: IPS e.max CAD | DC. RelyX Ultimate | 1 mn | 0 | 100 | |
Pr: 0 Mo:20 |
20 IC: Lava Ultimate CAD | DC. RelyX Ultimate | 1 mn | 0 | 100 | |||||||
Fasbinder et al. (2020) | University | L. IC | Modified USPHS |
86 M: 30 F: 56 |
120 Pr: 38 Mo: 82 |
Onlay: 120 | 60 L: IPS Empress CAD | DC. RelyX ultimate. Variolink II | 5 mn | 0 | 91.7 |
4 restoration fracture 1 restoration chipping |
60 IC: Lava Ultimate CAD | DC. RelyX ultimate. Variolink II | 5 mn | 0 | 90 |
2 endodontic treatment 2 tooth fracture 1 restoration fracture 1 restoration chipping |
|||||||
Molin & Karlsson (2000) | University | L. G | CDA |
20 M: 9 F: 11 |
20 Pr: 11 Mo: 9 |
Inlay: 20 Surfaces: 2: 9 3: 11 |
20 L: IPS Empress | DC | 5 mn | 0 | 80 | 4 restoration fracture |
20 Pr: 14 Mo: 6 |
Inlay: 20 Surfaces: 2: 4 3: 16 |
20 G | Zinc Phosphate | 5 mn | 0 | 95 | 1 hypersensitivity | |||||
Prospective | ||||||||||||
Donly et al. (1999) | University | G. IC | USPHS | 18 |
Pr: 5 Mo: 13 |
Inlay: 11 Onlay: 7 |
18 G | Zinc Phosphate | 7 mn | 0 | 83.3 |
x secondary caries x tooth fracture x restoration fracture |
Pr: 18 Mo: 18 |
Inlay: 32 Onlay: 4 |
36 IC | DC | 7 mn | 0 | 75 |
x secondary caries x fracture of tooth-restoration interface |
|||||
Manhart et al. (2001) | University. Students | L. IC | Modified USPHS | 45 |
21 Pr: 8 Mo: 13 |
Inlay: 21. Surfaces: 1: 1 2: 4 > 2: 16 |
21 L: IPS Empress | DC. Sono Cem & Variolink Ultra | 3 mn | 0 | 100 | |
37 Pr: 23 Mo: 13 |
Inlay: 37. Surfaces: 1: 4 2: 19 > 2: 14 |
37 IC: Tetric. Blend-a-Lux & Pertac-Hybrid unifill | DC. Sono Cem & Variolink Ultra | 3 mn | 0 | 89.2 | ||||||
Kaytan et al. (2005) | University | L. IC | Modified USPHS |
47 M: 14 F: 33 |
Mo: 87 | Inlay: 87 | 43 L: IPS Empress | DC. Variolink II Low | 2 mn | 7.4 | 97.7 | 1 endodontic treatment |
44 IC: Solidex | DC. Variolink II Low | 2 mn | 100 | |||||||||
Khairallah et al. (2009) | University | L. IC | Modified USPHS | 15 |
18 Pr: 6 M: 12 |
Inlay: 18. Surfaces: 1: 2 2: 3 > 2: 13 |
18 L: IPS Empress | DC. RelyX ARC | 6.25 mn | 0 | 94.40 |
2 marginal opening 1 endodontic treatment 1 restoration fracture |
18 Pr: 6 M: 12 |
Inlay: 18. Surfaces: 1: 3 2: 12 > 2: 21 |
18 IC: Targis | DC. RelyX ARC | 6.25 mn | 0 | 100 | ||||||
Retrospective | ||||||||||||
Haas et al. (1992) | University | IC. G | None | 73 | NS | NS | 30 G: Degulor C | Microfill Pontic C | 5 | NS | 100 | NS |
30 G: Degulor C | Zinc Phosphate. Mizzy-Fleck’s | 5 | 100 | |||||||||
30 IC: Coltene | Duo Cement | 5 | 80 | |||||||||
30 IC: Kulzer | Microfill Pontic C | 2 | 80 | |||||||||
30 GC: Dicor | Tulux Cement | 5 | 93.33 | |||||||||
Wagner and Schmalz (2003) | University | L. G | Modified USPHS | 64 |
84 Pr: 16 Mo: 68 |
Onlay: 84 | 42 L: IPS Empress | DC | 5.25md (1–6) | 0 | 96 | 2 restoration fracture |
42 Gold | Phosphate cement | 4.75md (0.25–13.08) | 0 | 96 | 2 extraction for periodontal reasons | |||||||
Bresser et al. (2019) | Private practice | LD. IC | Modified USPHS |
120 M: 42 F:78 |
197 Pr: 54 Mo: 143 |
Inlays: 9 Onlays: 188 |
144 LD: IPS e.max Press | Heated composite. Estelite Σquick | 4.8 mn | 0 | 96.5 |
2 secondary caries 1 restoration fracture |
53 IC: Adoro | Heated composite. Estelite Σquick | 4.8 mn | 0 | 94.3 |
3 secondary caries 1 endodontic treatment 1 severe periodontal breakdown |
NS, non-specified; LD, lithium disilicate; L, leucite; GC, glass ceramic; IC, indirect resin composite; G, gold; DC, dual cure; M, male; F = female; Pr, premolar; Mo, molar; md, median; mn, mean