Table 5.
GRADE evidence profile table for restoration survival: leucite versus indirect resin composite
| Quality assessment | No of restorations | Effect | Quality | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No of studies | Design | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Other considerations | Leucite | Indirect resin composite | Absolute | |
| 3 | Prospective studies1 | Very serious2 | No serious inconsistency | No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | 3/86 (3.5%) | 4/102 (3.9%) | 4 fewer per 100 (from 4 to 4 fewer)3 |
Very low |
OOORange of follow-up: 4–75 months
1Starting from a low-quality level of evidence
2Serious or critical risk of bias in Robins-I
3Non-significant effect